Uncyclopedia:VFH/EDSAC (3rd nomination)

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

EDSAC (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: EDSAC	Score: 14.5 Large and Shit Computers
Nominated by:	|Si Plebius Dato' (Sir) Joe ang Pinoy CUN|IC Kill | 02:08, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
For: 18	It had been quasi-featured twice. It's funny, it's a good quality article and is placed streets ahead of other articles. |Si Plebius Dato' (Sir) Joe ang Pinoy CUN|IC Kill | 02:08, 22 January 2009 (UTC) For then, For now, Forever. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 02:50, Jan 22 I continue to be for. I can't wait to vote for it again in four months. Hurrah! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 10:32, 22 January 2009 (UTC) For.--Sycamore (Talk) 10:34, 22 January 2009 (UTC) For. as with last time ~ 10:35, 22 January 2009 (UTC) For. I think it's good enough to get featured, unless you people want to make it a recurring in-joke to quasi-feature this article. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 16:07, 22 January 2009 (UTC) For. Yeah okay. T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:41, 23 January 2009 (UTC) For Per my first two votes, and the one I would have cast, had I been paying attention to VFH the other time it was up. -RAHB 11:09, 23 January 2009 (UTC) For I like it --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 11:29, 23 January 2009 (UTC) For. I am sick of this nomination being in an Eric Holder-like deadlock.FEATURE IT!Saberwolf116 03:30, 27 January 2009 (UTC) For not suffering a fifth nomination of this article. Good enough, and everyone else seems to like it. --Mnbvcxz 20:52, 28 January 2009 (UTC) For. Some grammar issues, but very good nontheless. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 03:17, 29 January 2009 (UTC) For It's got garumbah. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 03:17, 31 January 2009 (UTC) weak for, if only for the part with squirrels. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 18:06, 2 February 2009 (UTC) For. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 00:36, 17 Feb 2009 For. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 12:51, 25 February 2009 (UTC) For. Just messing with the universe --Kit talk 17:52 27 February For per my other two for's. —Sir SysRq (talk) 20:09, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
Against: 3.5	Against. Same reason as last time. IronLung 17:57, 22 January 2009 (UTC) Weak against. It's a reasonably solid article, I guess. Problem is, it's a little too close to the truth. What's true of EDSAC that isn't true of ENIAC, that's funny? That it became a vending machine at a frat house, I guess, but that's only slightly funny. pillow talk 17:58, 22 January 2009 (UTC) Against. Moderately funny, but would be a whole lot funnier if it kept getting quasis. How much space on the article can we fill up with them? Gis ym esiladnav! LOB 16:38, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Against. –72.193.236.89 18:12, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Abstain this is the fourth time its been on VFH. In addition to the two times it got quasi-featured, it was also nominated late November 2008. It scored 5 "for" to 2 "against", 0 "abstain", net +3 "for'. --Mnbvcxz 06:44, 22 January 2009 (UTC) Abstain. Per the last 2 times. I continue to completely miss what other people seem to find funny in this. --UU - natter 10:40, Jan 22 Sigh. So close to being featured, yet, so far.Saberwolf116 22:54, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.