Nom and For This article's been Thinkerized since it's last appearance on VFH. I think it's ready to be featured now. --PhlegmLeoispotter* (garble! jank!) 00:50, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
Self for Was improved substantially by thinker's round of editz, so I'm inclined to vote for. Oh yeah, and I also wrote it. --THE 01:36, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
For I like it - an original idea. Plus, the top pic would look great on the front page. -- GAZCO Itsa me, Gazco! (Yay for meeeee!) 20:50, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
I heartily endorse this article. Good execution on an idea that's feature-worthy in and of itself. — SirWehp! (t!) (c!) — 20:47, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
Against: 1
Against. The last "bit" is great. The rest isn't making the room spin. Also, can someone come bail me out? SirModusoperandiBoinc! 03:57, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
The nomination was not successful. rm +8, Darwin Rule, older clause<<>> This article did not pass VFH and was removed on 21:49, 31 July 2007 (UTC). This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.