FnORd Miley has carried the ball all the way on this one. Some good information and links within the funny. (I was the fifth yes vote. It must mean something?!?) Aleister in Chains 21:52 28 4
Bless. I still really don't understand any of this even after reading up on it AND working on the article, but I think it's bloody brilliant and thusly support it! ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*(talk)(stalk)Π ~ ~ 29 Apr 2010 ~ 00:30 (UTC)
Against. I can see a lot of work has gone into this but the first person approach doesn't work for me. Sorry. RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:22, April 29, 2010 (UTC)
Well written but I didn't find it funny. ~ 20:14, April 29, 2010 (UTC)
Against. Really doesn't work for me. --UU - natter20:43, Apr 29
Against. The first person style is inauthentic and tired. mAttlobster. (hello) 20:56, April 29, 2010 (UTC)
Against. First person articles are getting kind of old to be honest. And yes I am a hypocrite since One of my three features is not only 1st person, it is narrated by three different narrators. --SirSF13(Talk)GUNWotMRotMFBotMVFHSKMaj.ΥΣΣ01:53 EST 2 May, 2010
Against. This article thoroughly confused me. —Pelozurian (talk) 06:41, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
Some Discordians would say that by confusing you, their mission was accomplished.--Striker2117 06:48, May 2, 2010 (UTC)
You have to remember that a cat running around in circles confuses Paizuri. But a wise statement by Striker nonetheless. Al des chain 22:07 2 5 MMX
Against. I frankly think voting against an article because it's first-person is dumb. However, I just don't think this is to featured status. Could be funnier, could have better grammar in some places (I tried to fix that, but I got edit conflicted and my browser crashed so I just gave up) --Sir~HELPME~ Count!Awards!Pee!Help! 22:11, May 2, 2010 (UTC)
Against. Like a golden parachute this has all the ingredients for something really special and cool, but when you jump out of a plane with it it doesn't do what it is meant to do; this has excellent writers and ticks plenty of boxes but I just don't see it as a feature. It deserves its review score but I'm not seeing it as FA material. Sorry guys. Chiefjustice3DS 22:16, May 2, 2010 (UTC)
Just for information, one real explanation behind the numbers 5 and 23 is thusly: 5 was just picked by Discordians, Wilson, etc., because it was handy. But the point was that in any random series of events you can find a connection to five (or three, or nine) and explain everything with it. Conspiracies, etc. Wilson says if you can't find the image of the Virgin Mary within 10 feet of you then you're not using you brain right. 23, ah, the magic number. It "means" that any two people make up a third, a relationship that only the two people know, sense, communicate, nuance, or exist within. Nobody outside of those two people knows what that "third person" is that they create together. 23, every 2 people create a 3rd. Aleister des chain 19:25 28 4 mmx
Really you're right in some sense but there's more to it than that. I'll post something about it on the Discordianism talk page so this doesn't get too long. :) Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 21:34, April 28, 2010 (UTC)
Comment You have a bunch of random question marks in the beginning of the article that were not consistent with the writing style in the middle and the end? Please do something about that? ~ 15:43, Apr 29, 2010
The nomination was not successful. rm 23% +3~ This article did not pass VFH and was removed on 21:09, May 8, 2010 (UTC). This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.
Sir CPT Dr 
GUN UmP WotM NotM FP VFP VFH CM POTM UGM 00:40, June 5, 2009 Wednesday, 09:41, Apr 28 2010 UTC
For. Completed as April's 
Bless. I still really don't understand any of this even after reading up on it AND working on the article, but I think it's bloody brilliant and thusly support it! ~ 
Against. First person articles are getting kind of old to be honest. And yes I am a hypocrite since One of my three features is not only 1st person, it is narrated by three different narrators. -- 
