Self-nom, for... I didn't learn my lesson the first time. --monika 01:28, July 13, 2010 (UTC)
Very For Read this before, while it was growing, when on pee, read the pee and the discussions, and this is a very intelligent and well thought-out page. Yes, yes, a thousand times, yeah, why not, yay, six thumbs up, sure. Aleister 1:33 13 7
For. A strong vote for. Monika's story was so plausible that I checked wiki just to make sure it was total fantasy (and then noticed the photos at the bottom). Great piece of work. RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:16, July 13, 2010 (UTC)
For... Not the sort of thing I would generally read, but once I could be bothered I found myself rather impressed. ~ Apheori*shifty eyes*(talk) (stalk) -- 20100720 - 17:23 (UTC)
Against. Doesn't do anything for me. Rev. Zim (Talk)Get saved! 03:05, July 17, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
So I don't really do the self-nom thing much, so I'm not sure how required it is to point out that the pee exists or if it's okay to work under the assumption that people don't think I'm stupid, but it's something people seem to do, so hey. Wouldn't mind more peeing if anyone wants to add anything to that page. --monika 01:28, July 13, 2010 (UTC)
Featured. ~ 16:31, July 26, 2010 (UTC) This article has passed VFH and was featured on 27 July 2010. This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.