Nom + For. This article is written by Mhaille. It has to do with Pulp Fiction. I added a paragraph. It is hilarious. Can it get any better than this? --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 01:41, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
For Twisted, crass, disturbing, politally incorrect, stupid, funny... did I leave anything out? this is classic Uncyc material. Kudos! Rev. Zim (Talk)Get saved! 18:18, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
For, because I'm a mushroom cloud layin' motherfucker, motherfucker. -- Sir CodeineK·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 18:43, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
Against It's not the subject matter, and I've seen the movie. I just didn't find this article particularly funny. -RAHB 23:17, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
Against, though I'm amazed that Mhaille took a throwaway line from a movie and managed to turn it into a coherent page. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 00:02, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Not on the front page, please. •Spang•☃•talk• 06:00, 05 Aug 2007
Comments
At OEJ: See. The. Movie. Now. Not just so you could get the article, but also just because you need to see the movie. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 02:36, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
Yes, the sodomy scene is a crowd favorite.--<<>> 12:10, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
cringes I hate violent movies (if they do not star Graham Chapman and a killer bunny). I realize that this admission kills my bad-boy rawk-out image and all. (HA!) But. We will see. Thanks for the recommend. ----OEJ 15:49, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
It's just not funny to me...the title seems to promise over-the-top satire and it just doesn't quite get there. But I never seen th' moovie, so I dunno nuthin reely. (later) -- I moved this from Against to Comments because I just don't feel strongly enough to justify the vote one way or the other. Sorry, I have to abstain. ----OEJ 19:08, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
Abstain. Haven't seen the movie, maybe it'd be funnier then. --SirIsaac 01:22, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
Featured. •Spang•☃•talk• 06:44, 06 Aug 2007 18:44, 6 August 2007 (UTC) This article has passed VFH and was featured on 7 August 2007. This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.