Please rename this article to DSM and resubmit the nomination. DSM-5 (that is, a fictional 5th edition of the DSM) is your punch line, and the reader should not have to guess your punch line to read the joke. SpıkeѦ 13:34 21-Jun-13
I never said there wasn't one in the article, instead I give the actual release date of the real DSM-V in the first paragraph of the parody: December 2012. It really has been released, and is less than six months old. I found Spike's request slightly puzzling, but I'll name it DSM since that title is more general, and I imagine it could give the article more staying power. Phrank Psinatra (talk) 00:41, June 22, 2013 (UTC)
You guys know more than I do about the DSM. Give the article whatever name a real diagnostician would look for--though the point is valid not to include the version number in the page title (until such time as we have an article on each version....). SpıkeѦ 02:01 22-Jun-13
Comment. its a great concept and has very funny moments but I find it a little wordy imho. ShabiDOO 00:18, June 24, 2013 (UTC)
I don't see any fundamemtal reason to change the title. The author can choose whatever title he wants as long as it isn't disruptive or already taken. Your article...your title ..your'decision.--ShabiDOO 00:26, June 24, 2013 (UTC)
Comment. Too many red links for a start. Liked the intro but last bit looks under cooked in my view. RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 20:50, June 29, 2013 (UTC)
The nomination was not successful. Wasn't going to make it to a feature.RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® This article did not pass VFH and was removed on 09:47, July 28, 2013 (UTC). This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.