From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

DSM (history, logs)

Article: DSM

Score: 4

Nominated by: Phrank Psinatra (talk) 13:27, June 21, 2013 (UTC)
For: 4
  1. For. Phrank Psinatra (talk) 13:31, June 21, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol for vote For. After reading it a bit, its pretty good(writing and formatting)! Nice work Phrank! --The Shield of Azunai DSA510My Edits! 05:37, June 22, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol for vote For. And no more red links. Anton (talk) 20:10, July 3, 2013 (UTC)
  4. For. A bit listy but covers a lot of ground. LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 07:49, July 10, 2013 (UTC)
Against: 0

No against votes

  • Please rename this article to DSM and resubmit the nomination. DSM-5 (that is, a fictional 5th edition of the DSM) is your punch line, and the reader should not have to guess your punch line to read the joke. Spıke Ѧ 13:34 21-Jun-13
  • Done! Phrank Psinatra (talk) 13:49, June 21, 2013 (UTC)
  • There actually is a DSM-V, (it says aspies don't exist!) --The Shield of Azunai DSA510My Edits! 17:46, June 21, 2013 (UTC)
  • I never said there wasn't one in the article, instead I give the actual release date of the real DSM-V in the first paragraph of the parody: December 2012. It really has been released, and is less than six months old. I found Spike's request slightly puzzling, but I'll name it DSM since that title is more general, and I imagine it could give the article more staying power. Phrank Psinatra (talk) 00:41, June 22, 2013 (UTC)
    You guys know more than I do about the DSM. Give the article whatever name a real diagnostician would look for--though the point is valid not to include the version number in the page title (until such time as we have an article on each version....). Spıke Ѧ 02:01 22-Jun-13
  • Comment. its a great concept and has very funny moments but I find it a little wordy imho. ShabiDOO 00:18, June 24, 2013 (UTC)
  • I don't see any fundamemtal reason to change the title. The author can choose whatever title he wants as long as it isn't disruptive or already taken. Your article...your title ..your'decision.--ShabiDOO 00:26, June 24, 2013 (UTC)
  • Comment. Too many red links for a start. Liked the intro but last bit looks under cooked in my view. LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 20:50, June 29, 2013 (UTC)


← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Personal tools