Weak For. I didn't know how it would do when I reviewed, and cautioned against VFH, but it has my support if it is here. ChiefjusticeDS 21:15, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Against. Sorry, but it was just a laborious read for me. Nameable • mumble? • (UnScr:PWotM) 20:01, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
Against.. I can see this one huffing and puffing to get to the punchline. Is that deliberate ? If so it makes it less interesting and not a VFH contender.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 21:16, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
I can see youre trying to turn this into a personal matter, but doesn't VFH state that you should not take critisism personally? If I had been personal then you would have a reason to single me out here but My vote is perfectly valid. Now I did not enjoy the article simple as that. SirACROLOKUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 05:35, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
The fact is, a number of us have noted your tendency to vote aginst really good articles, and in favour of utter shit, and it's fucking up VFH. Romartus even more so. -- foreign Ape(neuter)(Riot Porn) 01:23, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
Featured. - T.L.B.WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 03:55, Aug 4 This article has passed VFH and was featured on 4 August 2009. This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.