Uncyclopedia:VFH/Creeping featurism

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search


Creeping featurism (history, logs)

Article: Creeping featurism

Score: 14 impossible features

Nominated by: 1234 ~ 16px-Pointy 16:18, 11 October 2011
For: 14
  1. Nom and for. This amuses me. Hopefully the technical whatnots won't be lost on the rest of you, since it be good. 1234 ~ 16px-Pointy 16:18, 11 October 2011
  2. For.--Funnybony Icons-flag-th Agnideva-small.jpg AGT-logo-small.jpg 16:41, Oct 11
  3. For--Iwillkillyou 333 TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 17:52, October 11, 2011 (UTC)
  4. Symbol for vote For. Sir SockySexy girls Mermaid with dolphin Tired Marilyn Monroe (talk) (stalk)Magnemite Icons-flag-be GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:40, 11 October 2011
  5. For. Sloublues 19:16, October 11, 2011 (UTC)
  6. Symbol for vote For. I understand and I wish to continue. HauntedUndies2. 07:19, October 12, 2011 (UTC)
  7. For. EpicAwesomeness (talk) 15:25, October 12, 2011 (UTC)
  8. For. I am a feature creep. Or a creep of some description. --UU - natter UU Manhole 19:37, Oct 12
  9. For. Naveenswiki 17:20, October 14, 2011 (UTC)
  10. For Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 02:34, October 16, 2011 (UTC)
  11. For. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Icons-flag-au 03:18, October 16, 2011 (UTC)
  12. For -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 23:40, October 18, 2011 (UTC)
  13. for --Nikau 14:07, October 19, 2011 (UTC)
  14. For. ChiefjusticeGameBoy 10:31, October 30, 2011 (UTC)
Against: 0

No against votes

Comments
  • Abstaining. I'm gonna leave this to the technical whatnots... Sir ACROLO KUNFPWAOTMFA •(SPAM) 17:01, October 11, 2011 (UTC)
  • Im a whatnot who is technically lost. --ShabiDOO 12:08, October 12, 2011 (UTC)
    That's what I was afraid of... if you don't get it, chances are quite a few other readers wouldn't either if it is featured. You know? Oh well... 1234 ~ 16px-Pointy 15:30, 12 October 2011
  • Abstain for now. Don't quite have time to read it, but the opening annoyed me as outsider humor. This has nothing to do with computer science, which is a subfield of math and is not so much an oxymoron as a misnomer. Computer Scientists have nothing to do with software engineering. It's bothering me more than it should, but I think that's largely because I really hate outsider humor and I especially hate it in an article that is otherwise insider humor. That, and I'm in a ranting mood. -- monika 19:25, October 12, 2011 (UTC)
    Ranting is fun. But you could fix it at some point; the folks responsible for this certainly aren't likely to object on account of not even having edited anything remotely recently... it's all ours now. And by 'ours', I mean 'whoever's'. 1234 ~ 16px-Pointy 03:06, 16 October 2011
    I'll consider it, but I'd have to find a way to make it funny to the people who thought it was funny before, and I'm not sure I can think like that. --monika 05:58, October 16, 2011 (UTC)
    Well, if you ever think of a way, it'd be nice. Doesn't even necessarily have to be any time soon; many previous features can be improved same as anything else. And many need it, frankly. 1234 ~ 16px-Pointy 15:23, 19 October 2011

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
Personal tools
projects