Uncyclopedia:VFH/Creeping featurism

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Creeping featurism (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Creeping featurism	Score: 14 impossible features
Nominated by:	1234 ~ 16:18, 11 October 2011
For: 14	Nom and for. This amuses me. Hopefully the technical whatnots won't be lost on the rest of you, since it be good. 1234 ~ 16:18, 11 October 2011 For.--Funnybony  16:41, Oct 11 For---   TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 17:52, October 11, 2011 (UTC) For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:40, 11 October 2011 For. Sloublues 19:16, October 11, 2011 (UTC) For. I understand and I wish to continue. . 07:19, October 12, 2011 (UTC) For. Talk! Contribs! 15:25, October 12, 2011 (UTC) For. I am a feature creep. Or a creep of some description. --UU - natter 19:37, Oct 12 For. Naveenswiki 17:20, October 14, 2011 (UTC) For Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 02:34, October 16, 2011 (UTC) For. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 03:18, October 16, 2011 (UTC) For -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 23:40, October 18, 2011 (UTC) for --Nikau 14:07, October 19, 2011 (UTC) For. ChiefjusticeDS 10:31, October 30, 2011 (UTC)
Against: 0	No against votes
Comments	Abstaining. I'm gonna leave this to the technical whatnots... Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 17:01, October 11, 2011 (UTC) Im a whatnot who is technically lost. --ShabiDOO 12:08, October 12, 2011 (UTC) That's what I was afraid of... if you don't get it, chances are quite a few other readers wouldn't either if it is featured. You know? Oh well... 1234 ~ 15:30, 12 October 2011 Abstain for now. Don't quite have time to read it, but the opening annoyed me as outsider humor. This has nothing to do with computer science, which is a subfield of math and is not so much an oxymoron as a misnomer. Computer Scientists have nothing to do with software engineering. It's bothering me more than it should, but I think that's largely because I really hate outsider humor and I especially hate it in an article that is otherwise insider humor. That, and I'm in a ranting mood. -- monika 19:25, October 12, 2011 (UTC) Ranting is fun. But you could fix it at some point; the folks responsible for this certainly aren't likely to object on account of not even having edited anything remotely recently... it's all ours now. And by 'ours', I mean 'whoever's'. 1234 ~ 03:06, 16 October 2011 I'll consider it, but I'd have to find a way to make it funny to the people who thought it was funny before, and I'm not sure I can think like that. --monika 05:58, October 16, 2011 (UTC) Well, if you ever think of a way, it'd be nice. Doesn't even necessarily have to be any time soon; many previous features can be improved same as anything else. And many need it, frankly. 1234 ~ 15:23, 19 October 2011

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.