Uncyclopedia:VFH/Creationism

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Creationism (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Creationism	Score: 12 God-Fearing Scientists
Nominated by:	Skinfan13 13:40, March 6, 2010 (UTC)
For: 12	Nom + For. I think I'm willing at this point to put my reputation on the line and nominate this.--Sir Skinfan13 Talk {< CUN RotM FBotM VFH ΥΣΣ Maj. SK >} 08:39 EST 6 Mar, 2010 Creationist For. Obviously. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:56, 6 March 2010 For. You guys did such a good job you have me believing the premise myself, praise God! Aleister in Chains 14:02 6.3. For. Amazing rewrite! This is better than some older colonizations. —Paizuri MUN ♦ Talkpage ♦ My Contributions ♦ 18:43, 6 March 2010 (UTC) For Can we nominate the majority contributors for sainthood?  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  06 Mar 2010 ~ 20:14 (UTC) For. ChiefjusticeGameBoy 20:20, March 6, 2010 (UTC) For. Megaman126512 22:00, March 6, 2010 (UTC) For. Let this be a feature. RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 00:49, March 7, 2010 (UTC) yes. i don't know why there needs to be a IC flag left aloft at both top corners, but that's not to fault this article. it feels like reading a serious essay of which suggests beliefs i don't share, and the humour i exert from that experience is replicated here. very well done and i think wonderfully directed. --nldr 01:02, March 7, 2010 (UTC) For. and Comment.. IC flag on both corners as when I re-created {{Colonized}} I modelled it on {{featured}}. So that's a template issue not the article. St. Sir CPT Dr PuppyOnTheRadio GUN UmP WotM NotM FP VFP VFH CM POTM UGM 00:40, June 5, 2009 03:39, 7/03/2010 For. My hope was that my colonizers would do the vast majority of the writing, that it would be very good, and that I'd just tweak it a bit here and there to bring it together. That's what happened, and I'm very pleased.  IC Buccaneer Admiral WHY??? (stratagems)  14:24, March 7, 2010 (UTC) For. --Matfen 19:29, March 7, 2010 (UTC)
Against: 0	No against votes
Comments	Comment. Yes, I know it's not required to list this here as the nominator didn't write the article, but Skinfan13 did write an excellent Pee Review. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 17:19, March 6, 2010 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.