Uncyclopedia:VFH/Content warning

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

< Uncyclopedia:VFH
Revision as of 13:44, February 21, 2013 by Romartus (talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search


Content warning (history, logs)

Article: Content warning

Score: 1 wary browsers

Nominated by:                               Puppy's talk page03:40 30 Jan
For: 4
  1. Symbol for vote Semi-self nom and for. Stolen from User:Argh_isle/Content_warning, and adjusted by myself, Al, Spike and Romartus. Obviously to be used for the site's content warning, but if we're going to have it as a front page for the site for any new viewers, we should probably VFH it.                               Puppy's talk page03:40 30 Jan
  2. For. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 06:42, January 30, 2013 (UTC)
  3. For. Despite my comments below, this has to be better than Lyth's kitties. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 07:01, January 30, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Yes, yes, a ... never mind. If featured can it have a green feature strip across the corner? But that may take away from the scary bit. Aleister 11:33 30-1-'13
Against: 3
  1. Symbol against vote Against. Let's find some way to thank nominator for his work without making this a FA. We may have to have a Content Warning, being hosted by a corporation in my lawsuit-happy country, but none of us like it. And the main page is for stuff we like, and think the new reader will like; not a Content Warning nor a new, improved Sidebar nor UN:HTBFANJS. They are all necessary but are not our features. Spıke ¬ 04:00 30-Jan-13
    PS--This means we should not have to vote to feature this to vote to install it as the site warning. But don't cite me as a contributor; my opinion remains that we should not crack wise with the nav-tools, including this one. What I would have done is at User:SPIKE/Content Warning. Again, the risk to the viewer is not that we are such defiant individuals but merely that the site is a wiki, and the page spends way too much time patting ourselves on the back for our dangerous cleverness. Spıke ¬ 10:52 30-Jan-13
  2. Against. Per my dislike of cracking wise with the navigation tools. Mn-z 13:36, February 1, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Against. Equilateralperil 09:54, February 2, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Personal tools
projects