Partial self-nom and for. Ok, so, here's what happened. Me, Lj, Modus, and a few others have been workin' on this page quite a bit over the past couple days, and I really think it's come out great. So here I am. - P.M., WotM, & GUN,Sir Led Balloon(Tick Tock)(Contribs) 21:26, Mar 9
Obviously But... I think it would have been nice to see this in the mainspace where it could have picked up a few more edits before being featured. MrNFork you! 23:22, Mar 9
Strong for. -- article is well executed and is a very clear parody of a very real idea. - Yamake::[Talk, Userspace][Contribs, Wikipedia] 06:17, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
For. If there's one thing I loathe, it's people who think that they're Conservative, but aren't. Aren't as Conservative as me. I'm crazy Conservative. Also, crazy. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 20:44, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Against. Sounds like a bunch of 14-year-olds ragging on another bunch of 14-year-olds...oh wait.--SirShandon (Talk) (Trophy Room) 07:29, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Featured. TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 22:45, 12 March 2008 (UTC) This article has passed VFH and was featured on 14 March 2008. This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.