Uncyclopedia:VFH/Colin Powell

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Colin Powell (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Colin Powell	Score: 16.5 Helpful advices...
Nominated by:	Self-nom. Pee reviewed here. pillow talk 03:29, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
For: 21.5	SNF. I know it's not a masterwork, but I think it's a pretty funny little article. pillow talk 03:29, 26 January 2009 (UTC) For. Short but funny. IronLung 05:23, 26 January 2009 (UTC) For That's one of the funniest Uncyc articles I've read in a while. -RAHB 09:14, 26 January 2009 (UTC) For.Why wasn't Colin Powell watching me play FO3 when I stumbled into evergreen mills?Saberwolf116 22:11, 26 January 2009 (UTC) For. Zarbag 22:14, 26 January 2009 (UTC) For Well I just have to vote for this awesomeness --- Ironfist Talk to me 01:45, 27 January 2009 (UTC) For. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  20:07, 28 January 2009 (UTC) For. Still think it's great. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 03:39, 29 January 2009 (UTC) For. I came into it expecting very little and was pleasantly surprised. Quite "public service announcement" aswell. Gis ym esiladnav! LOB 16:50, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Despite this being a Hyperbole article, I must say that this article epitomizes the spirit of Uncyclopedia, so it deserves to be featured. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 17:09, 29 January 2009 (UTC) For. Great article. --Docile hippopotamus 00:48, 30 January 2009 (UTC) For This article is good, but that guy has a weird first name. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 02:09, 31 January 2009 (UTC) For InfiniteMonkey 06:50, 31 January 2009 (UTC) He told me to vote for and recommended a great shopping website to boot. –72.193.236.89 08:51, 31 January 2009 (UTC) For Hilarious. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 15:55, 31 January 2009 (UTC) For PiRK 01:23, 2 February 2009 (UTC) For. Passed the giggle test. MrN  Fork you! 01:34, Feb 2 for. i was going to vote against, but colin powell appeared from under my desk and advised me to change my vote. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 18:12, 3 February 2009 (UTC) Yeah, what the fuck was I thinking; this is great stuff. --S0.S0S.0S.0S0 13:31, 6 February 2009 (UTC) Cheerful colored man. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 05:50, 8 February 2009 (UTC) For. A whimsical off-beat article. Thanks, whoever wrote this! Sradec 09:54, 8 February 2009 (UTC) No, this is a masterwork. Brilliant article, Hype. —Sir SysRq (talk) 15:30, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Against: 5	Against a bit too random, steam-of-consciousnessy for a featured article. --Mnbvcxz 04:03, 26 January 2009 (UTC) Namedropping, IMO. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:18, Jan 26 Against. I can't believe I'm voting against a Hype article, but it just didn't tickle me at all. Sorry dude. --UU - natter 11:42, Jan 28 Against. T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 17:21, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Against --Yodel monkey 20:00, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Abstain. This one really divides me. It's funny so I can't vote against but it's rather short. Even though I feel the style would work better with a fictional character, if Hyp were to sustain the basic concept with twice the material and keep it funny, inserting aspects of Powell's career along the way, I'd vote for. --    11:53, 30 January 2009 (UTC) Abstain.. This is the kind of stuff I like and I totally disagree with DrStrange, but it somehow feels like it needs to be smoothed out. Smooth, like Colin Powell's latte-toned backside. --S0.S0S.0S.0S0 03:41, 3 February 2009 (UTC) Although editing articles in the middle of VFH is weird, I fully trust you to do so if inspiration strikes. pillow talk 18:18, 3 February 2009 (UTC) I wouldn't want to fuck up an article clearly on the way to featuredom, but I might create a slightly revised version on my user page for your approval. But probably not; must play games. --S0.S0S.0S.0S0 23:54, 3 February 2009 (UTC) Careful. My gaming has cost me just shy of a grand this last couple weeks. pillow talk 05:03, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.