Uncyclopedia:VFH/Cluedo Columbine edition

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

< Uncyclopedia:VFH
Revision as of 10:06, December 12, 2013 by Romartus (talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search


Cluedo Columbine edition (history, logs)

Article: Cluedo Columbine edition

Score: 3

Nominated by: This is not a signature - WiiKend Magritte 15:32, October 28, 2013 (UTC)
For: 4
  1. Symbol for vote Self-nom and For. This article is an answer to the question: "is it possible to laugh about anything?" The real answer being "Yes, but not with anyone". This is not a signature - WiiKend Magritte 15:32, October 28, 2013 (UTC)
  2. This is about the most far out use of satire I've seen on this site, and although the topic is horrible, it's a unique page. And the author did create the graphics (I asked). God help us. (But Why?:Isn't it named Clue Columbine edition?) Aleister 28-10
  3. Symbol for vote For. Original and brilliant. This sort of comedy is hilarious. To make something atrocious funny may be bad taste but according to Ian Hislop Private Eye can do it so why not Uncyclopedia? Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 20:56, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
  4. For. Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 23:22, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
Against: 1
  1. As far as I can remember...I've never voted against an article on VFH...so sorry...but...Reading this just makes me feel sad...like depressed sad...and I barely laughed...only on the most shocking images...which after laughing...just bummed me out. I just don't see the satire throughout the article but rather in chunks. This article could easily be featurable...it just needs to depend more on the content, text, built up humour rather than shocking images and the "sad" vibe throughout in my opinion. --ShabiDOO 20:42, November 27, 2013 (UTC)
Comments
  1. I say, what the, how?, say what! Why isn't the artile named Clue Columbine edition? Never saw this page before and I must say it's a trip, and I may even have to end up voting for it if I get past my WTF reaction. In fact that reaction almost guarantees a yes vote, but not now. Must drink now. Aleister a few minutes before voting Boner
    by the way "Cluedo" is the name of the game in France (an maybe Europe according to Wikipedia). I had no clue the game was called "Clue" in the US. Of course it would be easy to change the title and the text according to that but I think I'm too lazy to make new illustrations. This is not a signature - WiiKend Magritte 16:48, October 29, 2013 (UTC)
    It is known as Cluedo in the UK and I believe everywhere else except USA and Canada (?). --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 21:08, October 29, 2013 (UTC)
    Reason I asked is because it's a U.S. topic. But yes, it would be a hassle to change the pics. I still like the page as a feature even though the bad taste argument is winning out. Aleister Devil's Night 2013
  • Abstain. Classic bad taste Uncyclopedia but disinclined to support it as a feature but won't go against. LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 21:06, October 29, 2013 (UTC)
    Same as Romartus. I don't think it is bad, (Aleister, what is 'ofornly'?) that's just that I really don't like the topic. One can laugh about anything but that does not mean everything funny should be featured. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 11:58, October 30, 2013 (UTC)
  • The image of the girls crying at the bottom of the article was too much for me. Sorry --ShabiDOO 03:30, November 6, 2013 (UTC)
    I agree, I think we should remove it. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 21:26, November 23, 2013 (UTC)
    weirdly the thing that is too much for me is the reason why the girls are crying, not the fact that they are crying. This is not a signature - WiiKend Magritte 23:20, November 24, 2013 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Personal tools
projects