Uncyclopedia:VFH/Classical Satire

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search


Classical Satire (history, logs)

Article: Classical Satire

Score: 11 horse-mangling classical humourists

Nominated by: Style Oranssiviiva Guide 07:03, December 13, 2009 (UTC)
For: 13
  1. Self-nom + For. I intend to reply to all against/comments on the article's talk page. Thanks for your attention. Style Oranssiviiva Guide 07:05, December 13, 2009 (UTC)
  2. For. Excellent Neo-Classical satire -- El Sid, the lazy oneparlez-vous franglais? 10:52, December 13, 2009 (UTC)
  3. For. Rabbi Techno Icons-flag-gb kvetch Icon rabbi Contribs Foxicon FOXES 12:26, December 13, 2009 (UTC)
  4. Nice. Sir SockySexy girls Mermaid with dolphin Tired Marilyn Monroe (talk) (stalk)Magnemite Icons-flag-be GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:23, 13 December 2009
  5. Touches me in my special places. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)
  6. Weak For. Reluctant, I'm not quite sure I get why I like it, so I dunno. But for now, it's a for... Dead-kennedysFUCK YEAH I AM SO PUNK ROCK!Dead-kennedys 08:17, December 14, 2009 (UTC)
  7. For 25px-Faglogo.pngtalk 10:18, December 14, 2009 (UTC)
  8. Weak for. It starts by saying that classical satire is so wordy and subtle that it's boring and unfunny, and then it tries to emulate that style. Not surprisingly, then, the article isn't really laugh-out-loud funny. But it's very well done. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 19:28, December 14, 2009 (UTC)
  9. For. -OptyC Sucks! Icons-flag-us CUN18:00, 15 Dec
  10. For. SIRE FREDDMOOSHA Flag of Egypt AMUSE ME • 04:34 • Wednesday, 16-12-2009
  11. For. Entertaining. Foot notes could've been a little more comprehensive though. Manosaurus 09:43, December 17, 2009 (UTC)
  12. Symbol for vote For..  –  FuhQ.gifFuhQ  ZDsig.gifZDsig Sheenicon.gif (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN DUN 06:22, 18 December 2009
  13. For. Didn't understand a fucking word of it. At least there is a completed review for it now. Pup 05:09, December 20, 2009 (UTC)
Against: 2
  1. Against. Reluctant against but I think it just tries to cover too much and doesn't flow smoothly to be satisfactory. LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:29, December 13, 2009 (UTC)
    See the comments on the article's talk page, please! -- Style Oranssiviiva Guide 19:20, December 13, 2009 (UTC)
  2. Against I'm inclined to agree with Romartus. I figured you were purposely trying to be boring, but unfortunately you did your job too well. I found myself accidentally skimming over the really funny parts because the article got so boring. I can appriciate the droning-professor tone if it is a bit more clever, but the article was just too wordy for the likes of me. Not saying it's a bad article, just that if it was featured a lot of potential users would see it and dismiss it after the firts paragraph. It doesn't have good readability.--Chay <Contribs UNSOC Also> 15:51, December 17, 2009 (UTC)
You too - see comments on the talk page of the article. -- Style Oranssiviiva Guide 16:23, December 17, 2009 (UTC)
Comments

Pee review here. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 10:24, December 13, 2009 (UTC)

Or not. Sir SockySexy girls Mermaid with dolphin Tired Marilyn Monroe (talk) (stalk)Magnemite Icons-flag-be GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:23, 13 December 2009

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
Personal tools
projects