For, though I was gonna write some actual text on the category or something, but fuck that honestly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 07:39, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
For. Filial Piety Scofield 09:08, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
For. Quick "for" before all the existential moralising "against"s. mAttlobster. (hello) 15:02, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
For I actually can predict the order of against votes. I do it all the time when one of my articles get nominated. Haven't ever been wrong, either. MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 16:20, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
For I read this article three times, and got more out of it each time. Aleister 16:22 19-3-'11
I dare say! The masses won't understand this on the front page at all! Who are we to alienate our loyal readers? These people come here every day, praying to heaven For. good articles, and we are to disappoint them with this drivel? Are you aware that we may drive some poor sap to suicide? And then what? Who are we to blame when there's blood on our hands? Who will stand and say "I voted for the article!" Will it be you? Do you want that on your conscience? I don't think so. What are we, working for the socialists now? You know their propaganda has destroyed our sense of proper humor, don't you? Take a look around. Slowly, day by day, our paradise is being corrupted by scoundrels like this, scoundrels would dare insinuate that a category page belongs on the frontpage of uncyclopedia. First, it's a talkpage. Then it's a category. Why, before long, we'll be featuring our own shit stains and the Marqui de Sade himself will come back from the dead to tell us how fucked up we are. Before long, our entire organization will be participating in corrupt satanic orgies and everyone will call us bastards. Everyone will leave out site because they think blue comedy is evil, just like how nobody watches south park anymore because it is evil, and we might get kicked out of our Ivy League clubs, and we will no longer be able to enforce the standards of comedy and that is bad. It'sMrthejazz... a case not yet solved. 03:16, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
Funnier than Filial Piety --Roman Dog Bird 03:10, March 21, 2011 (UTC)
For - My nomination got it featured, bitches. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 08:44, Mar. 21, 2011
I got a huge kick out of reading all of the past nominations, and some of it made me laugh out loud more than many featured articles. My god, a lot more people used to vote on things in the past no? I LOVE this guys articles tons, LOVE THEM, but I never understood what on earth/for the love of god/but seriously WHAT is so great about this article??? but I think this is helarious and very worthy of featuring :) So many clickable things too that lead you to different things in the sight for those who never see begind the scenes stuff. Lets be bold!!! --ShabiDOO 01:58, March 22, 2011 (UTC)
Against. We're on to its Cat now? I'd make a joke, but then I'd have to remember it to ensure that I didn't accidentally use it again the next time this gets nominated. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 03:53, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
Existential moralising against. Alternatively, just not finding it funny against. --UU - natter21:17, Mar 20
Against. Looks like another valiant effort to get a featured inside joke that's liable to turn off visitors and potential new uncyclopedians. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 07:29, March 22, 2011 (UTC)
I'll probably vote for this after you nom it at least 5 more times. -- BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 22:41, March 22, 2011 (UTC)
Comments
Comment. What's funny with that? ~ 08:57, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
You will be able to ask that question again in about three months when this gets renominated. I can also predict it will rain in the Atacama desert this year too. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:25, March 22, 2011 (UTC)
The nomination was not successful. rm low health, 17%ChiefjusticePS3 This article did not pass VFH and was removed on 22:56, March 22, 2011 (UTC). This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.
Wow! Did you see that? A talk page just got featured! Let's see how far we can take this. 
Against. I don't really do voting against but I think I voted for Filial Piety at least twice and now this.... --
Comment. What's funny with that? ~ 
