Capitalism: in grammar (history, logs)

Article: Capitalism: in grammar

Score: 7

Nominated by: ScottPat (talk) 17:04, April 3, 2013 (UTC)
For: 8
  1. Symbol for vote Nom and forClever use of writing in the style of the topic. ScottPat (talk) 17:04, April 3, 2013 (UTC)
  2. For. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 19:26, April 4, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol for vote For. It's brilliant, in the parts I've read, so I know all the caps and parts that irritate me, when I read them, they're more likely to be brilliant than not, so I'm ready to vote "For" on this. Will read more of it later. Aleister 1:02 6-4-'13
  4. Symbol for vote For. Works for me. Funny, clever, subversive, brilliant! Great article. GoldFishRock Goldfishr contribs talk    Monday, 18 June 2018 09:42 12:10, April 8, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Symbol for vote For. It's clever. Cleverness should be rewarded. It's also a good concept that's been pretty well developed. --Dr. Duff (talk) 03:30, April 12, 2013 (UTC)
  6. For. Funnybony Icons-flag-th Agnideva-small.jpg AGT-logo-small.jpg 07:50, Apr 14
  7. Symbol for vote For. Cute and clever! Spıke Ѧ 10:49 14-Apr-13
  8. For. Very original. Reverend P. Pennyfeather (talk) 19:39, April 14, 2013 (UTC)
Against: 1
  1. Symbol against vote Against. Reluctantly though. This has a fair amount of potential, but I'd avoid the BENSON reference (as too in-jokey), and remove the references to all individuals (GWB, Mitt Romney, Darth, etc.) I'd say it's a 30% rewrite away from a feature - it's just making sure the 30% goes the right way.                               Puppy's talk page11:30 12 Apr 2013
  • Comment. i get the concept and this has potential but it lacks any formatting beyond caps or no caps and the concept could be a little more developed/planned out. and expanded a little IMHO ShabiDOO 06:22, April 6, 2013 (UTC)
  • You tricked me. Since the page was so irritating towards the top and I started down deep in the article and was greatly impressed, I missed the George Bush quote and even a further reference to George Bush. So I can read no further. As Hugo Chavez said when he stood at the U.N. podium the day after George Bush stood there, "El Diablo was here. Right here. I can still smell the sulphur." But you got my vote before I saw that you have the devil on your page. Cat o'nine tails. Now I know it must be polished to perfection, as Shabidoo implies, and if you could get him to do a pee review of the page then two of our best writers will be communicating to each other. The potential ScottPat has is very good, and ScottPat, you should learn one thing alone followed by one other thing: As Funnybony said to me once, "Uncyclopedia is a playground for adults". And when you write here you should be banned if you don't follow Rule number three. Aleister 22:54 7-4-'13
  • I have only placed one George Bush quote in here. There is no further reference to George Bush. I'm not quite sure what problem you have with references to George anyway. Sir ScottPat Icons-flag-gb Scotland Flag 1 UnS CUN VFH (talk) 06:07, April 8, 2013 (UTC)
References to George W Bush date the article (even more if it is George Bush Sr), and are in general overused in other articles. We are looking for originality, as well as humor and prose. We want articles that will still seem current or at least relevant next year, unless they are an UnNews (which are typically about current events). George W Bush is old meme, if you know what I mean. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 22:20, April 11, 2013 (UTC)
If there is too much advocacy for your fellow lefties Aleister and Simsie, then there is way too much for me, though I didn't notice it. I did notice that the Infobox is wide and garish. Spıke Ѧ 10:49 14-Apr-13


← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.