FANDOM



Canadians (history, logs)

Article: Canadians

Score: 10 people who are watching Strange Brew right now, eh. Beauty.

Nominated by: Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:47, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
For: 11
  1. SN+F. I'm a little scared that this page may be too Canadian, but it's Canada Day long weekend, and this is about as nationalistic as I get. Enjoy! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:47, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
  2. For I truly enjoyed this. Happy 140th. Sir Roger 06:22, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
  3. Because your kind in Germany really annoys me. Sir Severian Severian1 CUN (Sprich mit mir!) Kraut
  4. Your kind everywhere annoys me. ~Jewriken.GIF 20:03, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
  5. For eh because I have nothing funnier to say -RAHB 20:29, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
  6. For If only for the fact that it is funny. --Andreasegde 20:37, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
  7. Dig It makes being a Canadian sound SO awesome! ;) --THINKER 01:13, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
  8. Weak For, even though we've already got a featured article on Canada, it's funny, I don't want Modus to think I don't like him (we've been butting heads of late), and it's infinitely better than anything on Canada by Michael Moore.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 03:31, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
  9. For. I swear, there was not a single error in the article that I could find. Also, Rachel McAdams is indeed dreamy. User:Wehpudicabok/sig2 04:12, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
  10. Beauty. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 03:26, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
  11. For. Lots of jokes. "Essentially Canada has produced Canadians that are Canadian because if they were not they would be Americans" stinks to Heaven of Satirical Truth. ----OEJ 15:48, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Against: 1
  1. No, Eh Tim Horton would be very disappointed by the amount of misspellings, poor grammar, and other un-Canadian things in this article. Sorry, but it doesn't pass QA. Dawg.gif » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 2007.07.01.06:30
Comments
  • Poor grammar? In a Modus article? I refuse to believe it. Especially since I scanned it just now, lightly but all the way through, and didn't find a single one (that you couldn't call "stylistic," such as speaking in a sentence fragment, a common intentional error). Perhaps you could point some out? User:Wehpudicabok/sig2 08:12, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Say, Modus, could it be that this is your first SNF? ~Jewriken.GIF 20:03, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
No. The first since the last one, maybe, as I am quite mad. Mad! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:07, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
Once upon a time, there was a user named Modus, who SNF'd everything he ever wrote. Then, one day, he grew up. That was a long time ago, and those of us that remember that day remember it fondly. It was, of course, just before he went mad.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 03:12, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Update. Aw, jeez...now with audio, eh. Sorry for the surprisingly crappy hoser accent... Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 07:52, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
  • The audio reminds me of one of those old wise Native Americans who made occasional appearances on Walker Texas Ranger -RAHB 08:35, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

rm +10, Darwin Rule, older clause

Click to feature this article
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.