Uncyclopedia:VFH/Cactus

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search


Cactus (history, logs)

Article: Cactus

Score: 15 crafty cactux

Nominated by: SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 17:50, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
For: 17
  1. self-nom & for. another article that took me months to finally complete. was it worth it? SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 17:50, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
  2. Symbol for vote For.. Definitely worth it! --Dame Sonjesig.pngCherry-blossom.gif 18:40, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
  3. For for sure, with cactus's --Globaltourniquet - (was TPLN) 21:20, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
  4. For. 81.225.45.139 21:57, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
  5. Gerrycheevers -OptyC Sucks! Icons-flag-us CUN22:03, 3 Apr
  6. For. Us hardy desert folk have to use cactorices for water. When the water pipes break down. Sir Groovester | Contributions | Talk Page 06:50, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
  7. For. Per my drive-by on the pee review. --UU - natter UU Manhole 13:21, Apr 4
  8. For. Per my drive-by on the talk page. Sir SockySexy girls Mermaid with dolphin Tired Marilyn Monroe (talk) (stalk)Magnemite Icons-flag-be GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 10:00, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
  9. For. Lol Nameable 16:34, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
  10. For. nom a cactus! 84.13.222.54 10:47, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
  11. W♥v. Sir SysRq (talk) 14:18, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
  12. For. That was seriously cute. --monika 07:33, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
  13. For. --Docile hippopotamus 08:50, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
  14. For. —Sir Guildensternenstein 18:36, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
  15. For. The Tibetan Titanium Tree was enough to get my vote. Rabbi Techno Icons-flag-gb kvetch Icon rabbi Contribs Foxicon FOXES 09:21, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
  16. For. That was wayyyyy better than I expected. ~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 00:19, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
  17. For. Awexome cactux --W.T. Door 21:53, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
  18. For. Well-written.-- Meta 500 02:07, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
Against: 2
  1. Symbol against vote Against. I don't find it funny enough for VFH. Actually..er..I didn't laugh once . Perhaps I don't know enough Cacti/Cactuses socially to pass an opinion here. --Romartus 20:48, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
    Perhaps. Sir SysRq (talk) 17:21, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
  2. Against. Mm. I felt that the article didn't have enough substance, I guess. Add more stuffs! Necropaxx (T) {~} 02:34, Apr 15
Comments
  • Abstain. Too funny to vote against, but I agree with Necropaxx: it just doesn't feel finished to me. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 23:38, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
Personal tools
projects