Uncyclopedia:VFH/Buster Keaton

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Buster Keaton (history, logs)

Article: Buster Keaton

Score: 22 Crocheted mittens

Nominated by: Dr. Fenwick 00:56, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
For: 23
  1. Nom Writer and Strong For - I believe this is by far the best article I've written on here!--Dr. Fenwick 00:56, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
  2. Fore!!! Wow, that guy would have a good poker face...but this is golf. User:Uncyclopedian/sig
  3. For. This is by far the best page you've ever written, and as far as I know and care, the only page as well. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 01:51, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
  4. For --Aljolson Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER Aljolson 04:52, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
  5. For. Solid, well-written biography. ----OEJ 14:23, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
  6. For--Gaberou 18:37, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
  7. F☭R, SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle
  8. For --THE 20:30, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
  9. For Great stuff. -RAHB 23:33, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
  10. Weak for User:Wehpudicabok/sig2 00:21, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
  11. For --Sir Starnestommy Icons-flag-us (TalkContribsCUNCapt.) 03:09, October 6, 2007
  12. 4 P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 20:12, Oct 9
  13. For. Post-edit. RabbiTechno 17:04, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
  14. For --  Le Cejak <-> 21:25, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
  15. For Well written. And funny.The preceding unsigned comment was added by Moneke (talk • contribs)
  16. Decent, funny, encyclopedic article, exactly the sort of thing we should be featuring. For. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)
  17. For. OK, I now officially like thist following the latest changes. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:05, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
  18. For With the new changes, I feel it's feature-worthy. Necropaxx (T) {~} 19:21, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
  19. For Now with Fenwick's changes. --YeOldeLuke 04:28, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
  20. For. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 07:28, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
  21. For--Sir Manforman CUN 20:50, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
  22. For--Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 22:29, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
  23. For --General Insineratehymn 00:07, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Against: 1
  1. Solid against. The pervasive sexual humor is obnoxious—like an adolescent who's just learned his first naughty word and is trying to prove how cool he is by employing it constantly. And the narrative gropes (no pun intended) too overtly for laughs.Morsa 05:30, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
  2. Against. For the same reasons as the other two antagonists; it kills the humor. Necropaxx (T) {~} 22:10, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Abstain. I like most of the article, but agree with Morsa that there are too many pointless sexual references. Remove them, and I may be moved to vote properly. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 12:17, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Edited -I cleaned up a bit of the article taking out the sex slave part and the masturbation/hentai bit as well I hope you enjoy it and are willing to vote For it now.--Dr. Fenwick 20:11, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Edited Even More - Okay I edited this even more and got rid of a lot of the pussy jokes! Hope you can vote for it now.--Dr. Fenwick 23:22, 14 October 2007 (UTC)


← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
Personal tools