For the lulz. Dark Ermac 15:09, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
for. hilarious and refreshingly different. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 20:14, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
Yeeee Hahhh!Geoffprickett 21:05, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
For. Se Aprovechan.Oskrawr 17:35, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
Against: 1
Against. Too much talking to the reader for my taste. --15Mickey20(talk to Mickey) 12:31, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
Comments
Comment. Mhaille could obviously claim 1/2 credit if he so chooses Le Cejak•<19:03, 27 Sep 2008>
/me holds the red rag out for Mhaille's charging bull... Step aside Lj... MrNFork you! 19:17, Sep 27
Thank you kindly sir, but all I did was add an image and a bit of text. Its all yours mate and you deserve the credit. LJ will have to wait for another day. ;) -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
Zorba If you decide to vote against, it's helpful if you give an indication as to what you did not like about it. No matter how brief, it's useful if you make a comment... In addition the temptation to make a undergarment related joke regarding the "brief" issue was almost overwhelming... MrNFork you! 19:50, Sep 27
Featured. RAHB 01:52, 2 October 2008 (UTC) This article has passed VFH and was featured on 2 October 2008. This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.