From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Brothel (history, logs)

Article: Brothel

Score: 13

Nominated by: Style Oranssiviiva Guide 15:22, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
For: 14
  1. For. Very good, innocent bit of writing. Style Oranssiviiva Guide 15:23, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
  2. For. Needed a proof read, but that's done now. Can't see any reason to vote against. RabbiTechno 15:44, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
  3. Strong For. The "Getting that Old Time Religion" section was genius. Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:01, Dec 17
  4. Ecstatic for. Just brilliant. IronLung 16:55, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
  5. For honorariums. Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 01:02, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
  6. For. Really enjoyed it. --UU - natter UU Manhole 11:08, Dec 20
  7. For I like deadpan.--Mnbvcxz 17:44, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
  8. for. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 21:21, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
  9. I approve of this article. I am the Supreme Ruler of Reality, kneel before my presence!
  10. For. 04:10, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
  11. For. MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 23:02, Jan 12
  12. For. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 15:36, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
  13. For. Asahatter (annoy) 18:53, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
  14. Strong For. Obscenely good. 19:11, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
  15. For. Again?Gut. 19:18, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
    You're only allowed to vote once. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 20:26, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
  16. For. Jd989 (talk) 01:29, November 26, 2012 (UTC)
Against: 1
  1. Against Had its moments, but overall didn't do it for me. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 03:23, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote Abstain. - Eh, if you guys say so...--Sycamore (Talk) 17:01, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment. Come on Sycamore, read it again in a better mood and vote for. Oops you were a contributor. Well, anyway. Style Oranssiviiva Guide 17:49, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
  • To be fair to Syc, I'd have abstained if I hadn't been in a good mood today. With Multiliteralist and Prettiestpretty now working on it, I have little doubt it's about to blossom into a fantastic article though. RabbiTechno 18:05, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
    • Multi, my mood is never the issue when I vote on here, I aim to judge each article fairly, I have one or two nice qualitys:). I feel that this is not a feature quality article - I'm unwilling to go into a debate though - Had I peed this, I would have had quite a few problems:)--Sycamore (Talk) 18:34, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment. I'll add some comments on the discussion page Style Oranssiviiva Guide 19:22, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
  • I will say this: Getting an Abstain from Syc is like getting 3 "Fors" from someone else. And getting a rare "For" from Syc is like going to heaven.... I've never been to heaven... :< The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 20:11, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment And if he can not support it, his abstention is like a Christmas present for this writer. I know what side my bread is buttered on. Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 20:53, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Abstain In addition, I'd just like to point out that I have no idea what PP's bread analogy means. -RAHB 07:45, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
    • Think about it. What would you rather have, the dry crumbles, or something tasty, satisfying and a possible link to heart disease. Hugs, Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 16:20, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Abstain. Could possibly, just needs a bit more...tweaking. Anyways, either feature it or don't; it's been a month.:/ The preceding unsigned comment was added by Saberwolf116 (talk • contribs)


← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
Personal tools