Uncyclopedia:VFH/Books never written

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Books never written (history, logs)

Article: Books never written

Score: 23 copyright 'infringements'

Nominated by: The Acceptable Thinking cap small Cainad Sacred Chao (Fnord) 06:20, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
For: 23
  1. Self-Nom and For. Although I considered leaving this article unwritten as a gimmick, my better judgment informed me that that wasn't funny at all. Also, it's a rewrite. --The Acceptable Thinking cap small Cainad Sacred Chao (Fnord) 06:20, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
  2. For. I like, though it might benefit from a bit of a tidy-up, it looks a little mashed-together in a few places. Good stuff, though. RabbiTechno 09:34, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
  3. For Was this vote even written? :o Necropaxx (T) {~} 22:10, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
  4. For --General Insineratehymn 23:42, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
  5. Dig As pee reviewer, I approve this vote. Or, this article. --THINKER 00:41, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
  6. For --THE 01:14, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
  7. Weak for. I agree with the pee review, particularly the bit about fleshing it out a little. I think there's plenty of room for more fun with this concept, but it's pretty good as it is. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 12:26, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
  8. For. I really enjoyed that. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  18:29, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
  9. For --YeOldeLuke 04:00, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
  10. Weak for but still main-page-able like this.     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   05:36, 13 October 2007 (UTC)  
  11. For, but needs more palindromes. Ж Kalir, Awesome Author(alliteration affords additional awesome) 19:39, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
  12. For as a matter of principle: the article will need to be rewritten a dozen times before Uncyclopedia or any other self-respecting publisher will shelve it, but I think we should feature it temporarily just so that we can say we got it before Monsanto. SmackBot 13:22, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
  13. For --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 00:09, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
  14. FOR -- sensual Ape (navigate) (Riot Porn) 19:51, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
  15. I would vote For, but Growing Locker Pot is too good of an idea to NOT write the book...--User:Doovad/sig 00:10, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
  16. For -RAHB 05:39, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
  17. For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 01:43, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
  18. ---Asteroid B612B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 01:47, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
  19. Yes! --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 22:58, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
  20. For --333pet 16:18, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
  21. Immensely Strong For Even if it was written by one of those aggravating users who have no userpage. --Acolyte MUN RA My cat is better than Benson harass stalk 01:34, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
  22. 4 - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 19:45, Oct 30
  23. For. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 05:44, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Against: 0

No against votes


LOL @ Radioactive afikomen: the version you're looking at now is basically all mine. --The Acceptable Thinking cap small Cainad Sacred Chao (Fnord) 01:55, 30 October 2007 (UTC)


← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
Personal tools