Uncyclopedia:VFH/Books never written

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Books never written (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Books never written	Score: 23 copyright 'infringements'
Nominated by:	The Acceptable  Cainad  (Fnord) 06:20, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
For: 23	Self-Nom and For. Although I considered leaving this article unwritten as a gimmick, my better judgment informed me that that wasn't funny at all. Also, it's a rewrite. --The Acceptable  Cainad  (Fnord) 06:20, 11 October 2007 (UTC) For. I like, though it might benefit from a bit of a tidy-up, it looks a little mashed-together in a few places. Good stuff, though. RabbiTechno 09:34, 11 October 2007 (UTC) For Was this vote even written? :o • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 22:10, 11 October 2007 (UTC) For --General Insineratehymn 23:42, 11 October 2007 (UTC) Dig As pee reviewer, I approve this vote. Or, this article. --THINKER 00:41, 12 October 2007 (UTC) For --THE 01:14, 12 October 2007 (UTC) Weak for. I agree with the pee review, particularly the bit about fleshing it out a little. I think there's plenty of room for more fun with this concept, but it's pretty good as it is. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 12:26, 12 October 2007 (UTC) For. I really enjoyed that. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  18:29, 12 October 2007 (UTC) For --YeOldeLuke 04:00, 13 October 2007 (UTC) Weak for but still main-page-able like this.     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   05:36, 13 October 2007 (UTC)   For, but needs more palindromes. Ж Kalir totally not Wario at all 19:39, 14 October 2007 (UTC) For as a matter of principle: the article will need to be rewritten a dozen times before Uncyclopedia or any other self-respecting publisher will shelve it, but I think we should feature it temporarily just so that we can say we got it before Monsanto. SmackBot 13:22, 17 October 2007 (UTC) For --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 00:09, 18 October 2007 (UTC) FOR -- erect Ape (plagiarize) (Riot Porn) 19:51, 20 October 2007 (UTC) I would vote For, but Growing Locker Pot is too good of an idea to NOT write the book...-- Sir FS Doovad Read You got somethin to say? 00:10, 23 October 2007 (UTC) For -RAHB 05:39, 25 October 2007 (UTC) For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 01:43, 28 October 2007 (UTC) ---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 01:47, 28 October 2007 (UTC) Yes! -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:58, 28 October 2007 (UTC) For --333pet 16:18, 29 October 2007 (UTC) Immensely Strong For Even if it was written by one of those aggravating users who have no userpage. --Acolyte MUN RA My cat is better than Benson harass stalk 01:34, 30 October 2007 (UTC) 4 - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 19:45, Oct 30 For. -- Mitch 05:44, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Against: 0	No against votes
Comments	LOL @ Radioactive afikomen: the version you're looking at now is basically all mine. --The Acceptable  Cainad  (Fnord) 01:55, 30 October 2007 (UTC) Also @ Radioactive afikomen: Read this and stop screwing up everything you sign. -- Mitch 05:53, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.