Uncyclopedia:VFH/Booger King

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search


Booger King (history, logs)

Article: Booger King

Score: 0 schemes towards Burger King

Nominated by: Sir Manforman CUN 23:00, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
For: 5
  1. Self Nom & For - Was a rewrite for UN:CW and is much better than before I rewrote it. I got it pee'd 4 times, and all of the suggests were taken into consideration and the article has improved each time it got pee'd, now it is ready for the front page --Sir Manforman CUN 23:00, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
  2. For -- Kip > Talk Works Puzzle Potato Dry Brush CUN Icons-flag-us 00:12, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
  3. Id like fries with that     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   00:33, 8 October 2007 (UTC)  
  4. For --Sir Starnestommy Icons-flag-us (TalkContribsCUNCapt.) 01:52, October 10, 2007
  5. Weak For. There's nothing wrong with it as such, it's just not to my taste - but that's a reflection on me, not the article. RabbiTechno 15:19, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Against: 5
  1. Weak Against Eh just really funny enough to me, didn't really enjoy reading it much. Sowwy! - UnIdiot | GUN | Talk | Contribs - 03:04, Oct 8
  2. Against Just not funny enough. The Oblong Lobster 22:55, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
  3. Against I Pee'd it and I just don't think it's VFH worthy.   Le Cejak <-> 23:42, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
  4. Nah. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 23:57, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
  5. Against -Too obvious.--Gaberou 00:35, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Comments
  • At the time you reviewed it, it wasn't VFH worthy, but I got it pee'd twice more, and it improved, so I thought I'd give it a go on VFH--Sir Manforman CUN 23:53, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Still no. Sorry, m4m!   Le Cejak <-> 00:03, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Personal tools
projects