Uncyclopedia:VFH/Bleach

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Bleach (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Bleach	Score: 6 fashion magazines
Nominated by:	— Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 01:18, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
For: 12	Nom and Don't You Dare Vote Against Because of the Subject Matter For. An old favorite of mine, this classic would easily win a Poo Lit for best illustrations (check the high-res versions for lots of hidden gags). The text's humor is more subtle, but some critics have praised it as being accessible even to those not familiar with its subject. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 01:18, 9 January 2008 (UTC) No idea why this hasn't been featured before? -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) It was good, concept, especially the pics. Just didn't really get the jokes/humour --Moneke 06:50, 9 January 2008 (UTC) For. - What Mhaille said. --SPY Administrator (Complain|I rock|In memoriam) HMRFRA WH 13:57, 9 January 2008 (UTC) Seriously, this hasn't been featured yet? —Hinoa talk.kun 00:00, 10 January 2008 (UTC) obligatory self For It was nominated once, then quasied, then de-quasied under the new rules. As for the length (as per the against votes), people keep trying to make it longer, and sometimes the changes stick. Sorry about that. --monika 01:40, 10 January 2008 (UTC) For     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   06:21, 10 January 2008   For. A wonderful twist on the manga. I haven't even read it, but it is genuinely hilarious. -- Kaizer the Bjorn takkun (nya nya) (1961 model!) Check out T61! 04:35, 11 January 2008 (UTC) For Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) For. It's much better now. --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 22:23, 12 January 2008 (UTC) For. Slavemaster convinced me -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:20, 13 January 2008 (UTC) For.It's awesome. --User:Micahthemonkey/sig 22:20, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Against: 6	Against. Started off strong with a good concept and good images. Then it just got long and intricate, and the main jokes got lost in the sea of ideas. Suddenly, I didn't care about the article anymore. -- \o/ 16:06, 10 January 2008 (UTC) Maybe I'm just missing something, but I feel like somehow a lot of this went over my head. It's probably just me, but, well... - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 01:28, Jan 10 Against I agree with above.-- Sir Claudius CUN VFH (carpe diem) 16:55, 10 January 2008 (UTC) Against. Per TheLedBalloon. -->:( 18:11, 11 January 2008 (UTC) Against --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 02:42, Jan. 12, 2008 Against. -- If you want anime on the front page, please visit Encyclopedia Dramatica -- I Am Your Master Insert complaint here
Comments	It needs more links and images in the controversy section. Then I'll vote for it.--Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 23:54, 9 January 2008 (UTC) Something like this (obviously incomplete and rough) work for you? I'll probably also do a sex tape screencap but I have other stuff to do tonight so it may take a bit. --monika 22:59, 10 January 2008 (UTC) Wait. Whose vote is that that is the first against vote? --SPY Administrator (Complain|I rock|In memoriam) HMRFRA WH 14:47, 10 January 2008 (UTC) Mine. The \o/ part of my sig disappeared? -- \o/ 16:06, 10 January 2008 (UTC) Slavemaster2: As I put in big, bold, annoying letters above, please do not vote against because of the subject matter. This is a quality article. And besides, there are multiple historical precedents for featuring anime-related articles on Uncyclopedia. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 21:59, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH