Nom and Don't You Dare Vote Against Because of the Subject Matter For. An old favorite of mine, this classic would easily win a Poo Lit for best illustrations (check the high-res versions for lots of hidden gags). The text's humor is more subtle, but some criticshave praised it as being accessible even to those not familiar with its subject. — SirWehp! (t!) (c!) — 01:18, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Seriously, this hasn't been featured yet? —Hinoatalk.kun 00:00, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
obligatory self For It was nominated once, then quasied, then de-quasied under the new rules. As for the length (as per the against votes), people keep trying to make it longer, and sometimes the changes stick. Sorry about that. --monika 01:40, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Against. Started off strong with a good concept and good images. Then it just got long and intricate, and the main jokes got lost in the sea of ideas. Suddenly, I didn't care about the article anymore. --\o/ 16:06, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Something like this(obviously incomplete and rough) work for you? I'll probably also do a sex tape screencap but I have other stuff to do tonight so it may take a bit. --monika 22:59, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Mine. The \o/ part of my sig disappeared? --\o/ 16:06, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Slavemaster2: As I put in big, bold, annoying letters above, please do not vote against because of the subject matter. This is a quality article. And besides, there are multiplehistoricalprecedents for featuring anime-related articles on Uncyclopedia. — SirWehp! (t!) (c!) — 21:59, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
The nomination was not successful. rm low health 46% +6 ~ Mordillo where is my PIECE OF CHICKEN SHIT? This article did not pass VFH and was removed on 08:45, 15 January 2008 (UTC). This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.