Uncyclopedia:VFH/Bildungsroman

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search


Bildungsroman (history, logs)

Article: Bildungsroman

Score: 4.5 comin' of age masterpieces

Nominated by: Mhaille
For: 8
  1. For, a work of comedic genius. Feature or be damned. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)
  2. For. Smart. --UU - natter UU Manhole 09:14, Aug 23
  3. For. I don't get it, and I don't like Sycamore--Sycamore (Talk) 14:03, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
  4. Symbol for vote Anything that takes jabs at Salinger is good in my book. MacManiasig.png MacManiasig-cheerios.png MacManiasig-holmes.png MacManiasig-starwars.png MacManiasig-firefly.png MacManiasig-pixar.png MacManiasig-oregon.png MacManiasig-lesmiz.png MacManiasig-doctor.png 16px-HalLogo.png Portal16px.png UncycLensFlare16px.pngDalek16px.png 16px-ChekhovSig.png16px-JapanSig.png Sir MacMania GUN[14:05 23 Aug 2010]
  5. Symbol for vote For. I've read this in the past (I read way too many pages here) and liked/like/likey it. ALeister 15:25 23 8
  6. Symbol for vote For. Sir SockySexy girls Mermaid with dolphin Tired Marilyn Monroe (talk) (stalk)Magnemite Icons-flag-be GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:48, 23 August 2010
  7. For. Sycamore has a crab like, sideways approach to stories that are indeed sometimes very quirky. It's a talent worth celebrating here with a vote in favour. LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:32, August 26, 2010 (UTC)
  8. For. But there are some spots that might be neater my daddy thought walking. Style Oranssiviiva Guide 17:58, August 26, 2010 (UTC)
Against: 3.5
  1. Against. I don't want to be a grammar nazi here, but the comma splices and run-on sentences were so abundant that I felt like I had to struggle through every sentence like a child learning to read. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 00:10, August 25, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Against. 186.45.182.202 21:41, August 25, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Against. Same reason as Hyperbole, actually... run-on sentences, comma splices... and then sentence fragments that for no apparent reason, even have the transition words to make them part of the previous sentences, are cut off, and now I'm making a run-on sentence, too. Oh, glory day. But for the record, cramming two sentences together with a comma as the sole concatenating thingy does not proper longer syntax make. ~ Pm *sqlorsh* (harass) (stalk) -- 20100826 - 23:44 (UTC)
  4. Hype. Nail on the head. A well-written, rereadable article needs to be, well, well-written. Aiming for labyrinthine sentence structures with intent to make your audience reconsider what they just saw seems extremely counterintuitive. Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 16:36, August 27, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
  • Hype, I've had a look through, and I admit I tend to like using longer syntax as is often used in older novels - this is just a preference, not an error. I write articles like these are not intended to be easy quick reads, but ones to be re-read.--Sycamore (Talk) 09:23, August 25, 2010 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Personal tools
projects