Well I really liked it, and yeah. It's been Pee Reviewed and everything. Nameable • mumble? 22:35, March 22, 2010 (UTC)
For. Of course. A well written presentation of a Kafkaish situation--a hero trapped by his enemy in a psych hospital. The story of my life! Aleister in Chains 1:14 23 3 MMX
For I sat this one out I wasn't really into Batman. It's come out really well though as a finished product. I think broad subjects should have specific interesting ideas applied to them and this does and does work. mAttlobster. (hello) 18:50, March 23, 2010 (UTC)
For Given that an entire wiki could be created just about Batman (and has been), it had to be limited somewhere, and it was. And I love acronym based jokes when done properly. User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sigheilWednesday, 23:03, Mar 24 2010 UTC
'For Absolutley brilliant. This article has just been ruined edited by an idiot a genius.12:51, 03 29
It's very nicely done, but I'm not afraid to label the topic as slightly, well, unique. Similar reason I didn't feel MJ should've been featured, I suppose, there are a lot of angles that this article could've gone. "UnScripts:Psychiatric Report - Bruce Wayne", maybe, but a bit too broad for the whole article on the capester himself. --nldr 02:37, March 23, 2010 (UTC)
Against. I'm with Nachlader on this one. I'm not a fan of the concept as it is now standing for all that is Batman. If the title were changed to something less broad, I would consider moving my vote. •••Necropaxx(T){~}Tuesday, 05:21, Mar 23 2010
Against. Sorry, just didn't like it that much. It'd definitely be betterwith another title, though. Maybe redirect to Bruce Wayne or something? ~ SirPaizuri / Talk / Contribs / Crap / 06:45, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
Against. Feels like a case of Hollywood Tourism to me. Sorrweee.--Matfen 16:39, April 1, 2010 (UTC)
Against. Not an encyclopedic article. InMooseWeTrust 22:51, April 2, 2010 (UTC)
Bingo. People, please stop writing articles like this. --Roman Dog Bird 18:28, April 3, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
Meh. Unlike the last one (creationism) which I reviewed and nominated, I don't feel especially compelled to vote for this one. I think it has enough humor to warrant an abstain instead of an against though. --SirSkinfan13Talk{< CUNRotMFBotMVFHΥΣΣMaj.SK>} 18:45 EST 22 Mar, 2010
Abstain. As a rewrite/collaboration this is commendable and I liked the ambition shown in tackling this subject. Yet it doesn't really build into anything, or a twist perhaps besides the report at the end. It just needed a bit of an off the wall direction for me to make this a stand out for featuring. RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 00:43, March 25, 2010 (UTC)
The nomination was not successful. rm 24% +4~ This article did not pass VFH and was removed on 20:56, April 5, 2010 (UTC). This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.