Nom and for - This is my first time sticking something on VFH, and I'd just like to see how well it does. Thanks for reading/voting. --Dr. Love 23:40, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Dig I'm amazed that I like this article. However, I actually really do. I agree with LordKaT though; maybe a little broader joke spectrum would help, but as is, I'm still voting in favor. --THINKER 00:26, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
For. LordKaT brings up some good points (for the first time in his career), but the article has some good jokes. I like the section on his political standings, but I don't think they need to be formatted like that. ЖKalirhippies! yay! 01:25, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Weak for. I think it's just about good enough as it is, but it could be even betterer. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 18:52, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
For Better than a lot of the crap that gets featured --Uncle J 19:16, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
For awesome!!! --User:Nw0428/sig 00:05, 23 January 2008(UCT)
Against: 6
Against. I like it, but I don't love it. It has a lot of potential, but the last two sections need to be expanded, and the jokes need to venture beyond the racial.--\o/ 23:51, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Against As per potential. As a side note, though not necessarily related to the vote, you must realize that this guy could be the next president, hence a rewrite since the campaign jokes would be defunct. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 13:47, Jan. 14, 2008
Against. it's too short, and, of course, like they said, potential etc. Also, I didn't really find it funny. No offense! ~FagxFS
Damn... Kip makes a very good point about the potentially terminal topicality --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 21:55, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
Eh I dislike this article for some reason. I know it's not just me. It's missing....lots. Potential, but definitely not FA in my opinion. -RAHB 08:54, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Comment - Kip makes a very good point on that one, but if it does get the necessary support, perhaps the campaign section could remain its own part, with an election section and the rest of his career added thereafter. I do agree that this is a bit premature for it only being January. --THINKER 13:57, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Comment - so if the article is featured, does that means it will never be edited or updated? Take You Are Dead, George W. Bush for example or even Worst 100 Ways to Deliver Bad News, all articles which have been edited after being featured. --Æ 22:39, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
If he becomes president, we could always move this to "Barack Obama: The early years", or some such nonsense. --15Mickey20(talk to Mickey) 15:43, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
If he becomes president, no one will be able to keep up with the rampant IP edits which are certain to occur anyway. So I don't think we'll really have to worry much about the future on this one. --Dr. Love 04:25, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
About my future presidential point, I just threw that out there. My main against vote was over potentialness. If it were to be featured, I would be a strong supporter of moving it, as per 15Mickey20. Change. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 12:54, Jan. 17, 2008
Ab-stain Think. If he is president there will be much much much more to add, some of which might be funnier. This had some great jokes but... Give it time IMO. SirDJ~Irreverent
Ab-Stain I really don't like the picture with the mustache and some of the jokes are hard to wrap my head around. Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!)
The nomination was not successful. rm low health 32% +7 ~ Mordillo where is my PIECE OF CHICKEN SHIT? This article did not pass VFH and was removed on 08:15, 27 January 2008 (UTC). This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.
Against. I like it, but I don't love it. It has a lot of potential, but the last two sections need to be expanded, and the jokes need to venture beyond the racial.--
