Uncyclopedia:VFH/Balloon Animals

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Balloon Animals (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Balloon Animals	Score: 19.5 new balloon species
Nominated by:	Tagstit    talk    contribs    awards   07:35, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
For: 22.5	Nom and for This is probably one of my favorite articles concept-wise that I have written and it is something I wrote a while back. I redid it after some suggestions (and a little extra help) from Gerry, and fixed it up in some parts. I think it is ready now and want to see how it does.    Tagstit    talk    contribs    awards   07:35, 30 May 2009 (UTC) For. --Docile hippopotamus 11:22, 30 May 2009 (UTC) Inflated For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:25, 30 May 2009 (UTC) For. Some parts are "deflated," if you will, but the rest is... very... I'm tired of balloon metaphors at this point.   Le Cejak • <15:59 May 30, 2009> For. Dame 16:39, 30 May 2009 (UTC) For. I go love balloons ! I want to be five again !!Romartus 16:55, 30 May 2009 (UTC) Needles from the sky! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 21:38, May 30 Strong for I love this. I love you. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 04:53, 31 May 2009 (UTC) Agai-- I mean For. Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 09:32 May 31 '09 For Sexy Chick Zeitgeist 19:58, 31 May 2009 (UTC) for who doesnt like ballons--Iwillkillyou333 20:00, 31 May 2009 (UTC) For. 213.112.133.182 13:57, 5 June 2009 (UTC) For. I like it! --72.88.105.73 16:31, 5 June 2009 (UTC) For. Nice. --UU - natter 12:30, Jun 8 For Yodel monkey 15:10, 8 June 2009 (UTC) For. It made me laugh. Nameable • ((mumble?)) • 20:23, 8 June 2009 (UTC) 'FOAR!' 75.166.139.168 05:19, 9 June 2009 (UTC) for. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 20:21, 9 June 2009 (UTC) for -PET 15:04, 12 June 2009 (UTC) For. Mario4576 20:29, 12 June 2009 (UTC) For. -- DameViktoria - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 12:08, 13 Jun 12:08, 13 June 2009 (UTC) For. I did a rather rushed audio version. Remove it if it sucks. T. (talk) 12:59, 13 June 2009 (UTC) For As Guildy pointed out, the language could use a little clean up here and there, but overall I liked this. -OptyC Sucks! CUN17:10, 13 Jun Strong for. You can't vote against a Tagstit article! --It's Me Bitches! Don't worry, I won't kill you. 17:25, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
Against: 3	Against It's a good idea dn everything, but It's "deflated" like Cajek said. I didn't laugh really at all. Staircase CUNt 16:20, 30 May 2009 (UTC) Against. Not feeling it, sorry Tags. IronLung 02:22, 31 May 2009 (UTC) Against. Per Above. It's a step down from Oscar. Don Puttano cHeDDs 01:54,9June,2009 01:54, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Comments	The review is here. Gerry also did one on this, but I again, can't find it.   Tagstit    talk    contribs    awards   07:36, 30 May 2009 (UTC) The other reviews are here and there. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:23, 30 May 2009 (UTC) Abstain. This (in my opinion) is plagued with the same problem that Oscar the Grouch had. The language is awkward, and as a result an amazing concept is knocked down a peg or two. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 14:48, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.