Unquilified selfNOM and just adore them!Funnybony 21:48, December 17, 2009 (UTC)
For. Yaosir!!! Funnybony 21:49, December 17, 2009 (UTC)
Against. I've never voted against an article before this, I usually vote for or abstain quietly. In this case, however, I did not find it funny in the slightest. SuperBario 23:37, December 17, 2009 (UTC)
Against. I did find it funny, but funny in the sense: "Wow, someone actually wrote that." Maybe I'm just careful out of principle, but where I come from you actually get killed for stuff like this. So I'm gonna have to say no--22.214.171.124 11:32, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
Against. As above all comments. If Funnybony thinks this will make us laugh , I wonder what we can expect next. RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 12:00, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
Author could have been former President of the NAACP or Martin King reborn to get revenge by writing the article. The dilemma created by the founding fathers is clearly explained. It's Pro Bro!!! - this article subject is the virgin sister of Mike Tyson.
The nomination was not successful. rm -8.5SirModusoperandiBoinc! This article did not pass VFH and was removed on 12:32, December 18, 2009 (UTC). This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.