A spectacualar concept filled with lots of great ideas. I laughed a few times. I do...however...find it difficult to get what your strategy was in melding the AAA and atheism and the political right and batteries and what kind of narrative the reader should follow. There seem to be a lot of ideas and references that might be better tied together if the article was about atheism with frequent references/analogies to automobile problems, or if it was about automobile problems with frequent references/analogies to atheism or followed a story line or if it was encyclopeidic. In my humble opinion that is. --ShabiDOO 01:52, July 22, 2013 (UTC)
As mentioned in a nearby vote (where I went in and edited the article), I'll vote For when author drops his insistence on British spelling to write about an American organization. Unlike Shabidoo, I thought the blurring with the American Automobile Association was a good way to highlight this obscure group without giving the impression of advocacy. Spıke¬ 12:39 16-Aug-13
Fair enough Spike. I'll try but I don't have the widest knowledge of American vocabulary. SirScottPat (talk) VFHUnSNotM 17:50, August 16, 2013 (UTC)
The nomination was not successful. Not enough atheistsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® This article did not pass VFH and was removed on 06:51, September 23, 2013 (UTC). This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.