Uncyclopedia:VFH/Antbortion

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Antbortion (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Antbortion	Score: 16 ants needed per square pound in order to have a successful-- look, I have the conversion charts right here- /flips through some papers covered in blood I'll be with you in a second, hold on- /rifles through the necronomicon Uh, look, here's the scoop: this article is the worst thing ever.
Nominated by:	Le Cejak • <9:11 May 29, 2009>
For: 17	Whoa   Le Cejak • <9:11 May 29, 2009> For.. Truly horrific! Dame 13:15, 29 May 2009 (UTC) My Mormon self reviles in horror. "What have I done?!" SelfFor. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 15:30, May 29 Baby hole. Yup. -OptyC Sucks! CUN15:34, 29 May For. It isn't perfect, but it's still an excellent rewrite. Saberwolf116 15:35, 29 May 2009 (UTC) For. per above. Mnb'z 18:20, 29 May 2009 (UTC) Disgusting. Sir Groovester | Contributions | Talk Page 01:13, 30 May 2009 (UTC) whoa this used to kinda suck but necropaxx made it all cool awesome --Roman Dog Bird 01:19, 30 May 2009 (UTC) For. MagaMaga 02:23, 30 May 2009 (UTC) For. --Docile hippopotamus 02:25, 30 May 2009 (UTC) For. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 03:01, 30 May 2009 (UTC) Yes! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:18, 30 May 2009 (UTC) For. This article is amazing. rofl Lefaid 08:38, 31 May 2009 (UTC) For. Great! IronLung 09:48, 31 May 2009 (UTC) For Sexy Chick Zeitgeist 20:03, 31 May 2009 (UTC) Foar Am I late? Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 11:08 June 3 '09 How Did I Not Vote Yet? Don Puttano cHeDDs 23:14,3June,2009 23:14, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
Against: 1	Against. Yes it was extemely well written and even linked to one of my articles, it just didn't make me laugh. Sorry. :/ ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 05:46 2 June 2009
Comments	Abstain It's definitely a good article, and there's no way I would vote against, but it just didn't make me laugh. Staircase CUNt 17:02, 29 May 2009 (UTC) Abstain It isn't badly written or has another major flaw I just went ewwww rather than lololololol. Also the 9/11 part is very losable. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 04:24, 30 May 2009 (UTC) Abstain. A reluctant abstain. I like the crazy idea and execution but it is a bit of a 'hmmmm' one for me. May reconsider. --Romartus 17:04, 30 May 2009 (UTC) Abstain. It's a very good article, but similar to DJ Irreverent, I was kind of like Yuk! rather than Hah! Nameable ((talk?)) 20:10, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.