Nom & For. Aleister has been studiously tweaking this (and letting others pee on it) since joining us three months ago and I think it's time to pop his VFH cherry. Be gentle.-- 12:11, January 12, 2010 (UTC)
For. Aleister worked on this and took on board comments and additions from other contributors including myself. Now I think it deserves a chance here. RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:12, January 12, 2010 (UTC)
For. Wonderful. IronLung 17:54, January 12, 2010 (UTC)
This would be good in some other "pedia", but not this one. Unpschyelopedia 08:39, January 25, 2010 (UTC)
Thanks, hit-and-run noobie, for your keen observations and insights. Aleister in Chains 25 Jan. MMX
Comments
F. darkbladeus took a good pee on this, Romartus added the "real" Hathaway photos and their captions (and a late "real Anne" photo substitution that Socky found), and Doc pointed out randomness's'ss's.'s. As Doc explained, I've worked on this nonstop for three months, sleeping in catnaps and losing muscle mass, and saw the sun for the first time since October just this afternoon. Aleister in Chains The Year of Our Fnord MMX
To beat my own bared breasts for a moment. Ummmm. Ok, now that that's done, may I non-humbly suggest that the satire on the Hathaway page runs deep and long (damn, wait a minute. . .OK, now that that's done), and hopefully the entire article is read, reread, studied (papers due on Monday), and . . .well, you know, just give it a good look, and forget about the breasts for a few minutes. The lead and some of the next section were written not to be terribly funny but to set up the piece. DocStrange told me that "randomness" may become an issue, and suggested that I address it early, which is what the Ebert quote and some of the 'Early life' section "attempts" to do. There you go, 'nuff said. Alei' in Chains Larry Sanger Lives!, late January, MMX
Ok Aleister, I've re-read it. Either it's improved some or I was a bit harsh the first time, either way you've convinced me to remove my against vote. However I still don't think I can vote for. I'm abstaining now, which should bump your score a little anyway. --Hugs and kisses,Black_Flamingo 23:01, January 27, 2010 (UTC)
UnAbstain. The boobs make me want to vote for, but the slightly-off formatting make me want to go against. Plus not many people on Uncyc like these kind of articles. Y'know, the ones with a lot of words, and less obvious jokes. --Matfen 12:46, January 23, 2010 (UTC)
Featured. ~ 22:23, February 12, 2010 (UTC) This article has passed VFH and was featured on 13 February 2010. This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
There are tits There is yes. 
22:23, February 12, 2010 (UTC)
