#{{Against}} [[User:Wilytank|Wilytank]] 12:33, August 6, 2010 (UTC)
#{{Against}} [[User:Wilytank|Wilytank]] 12:33, August 6, 2010 (UTC)
#'''Against''' {{User:Dexter111344/sig}} 12:42, August 6, 2010 (UTC)
#'''Against''' {{User:Dexter111344/sig}} 12:42, August 6, 2010 (UTC)
−
#'''Against'''. I'm still more of a fan of the idea than the execution. The idea is great, it makes me smile. But the article still feels laboured. A couple of decent lines have been added, but for me, I feel like I'm working through a lot of explanation for just a few pay-offs, and only a couple of those are worth it. I may be missing some gems, but I did read it a couple of times, and it just didn't engage me or make me chuckle. Hope that's enough explanation. --{{User:Under_user/sig3}} <small><font color="navy"><i>12:55, Aug 6</i></font></small>
+
#'''Against'''. I'm still more of a fan of the idea than the execution. The idea is great, it makes me smile. But the article still feels laboured. A couple of decent lines have been added, but for me, I feel like I'm working through a lot of explanation for just a few pay-offs, and only a couple of those are worth it. I may be missing some gems, but I did read it a couple of times, and it just didn't engage me or make me chuckle. Hope that's enough explanation. --{{User:Under_user/sig3}} <small><font color="navy">''12:55, Aug 6''</font></small>
#'''Against'''. I'm no prude and I'll try most things once, but(t} think in its excitement this delivers far too quickly. My feeling is that a lot more could have been packed in. -- {{User:Mhaille/sig}}
#'''Against'''. I'm no prude and I'll try most things once, but(t} think in its excitement this delivers far too quickly. My feeling is that a lot more could have been packed in. -- {{User:Mhaille/sig}}
#'''Against'''. {{User:An Ape that Only Exists on Thursdays/sig}} 21:48, August 6, 2010 (UTC)
#'''Against'''. {{User:An Ape that Only Exists on Thursdays/sig}} 21:48, August 6, 2010 (UTC)
Score:11.5 individually packaged hand wipes next to the lube
Nominated by:
07:30, August 5, 2010 (UTC)
For: 20.5
Nom and fuck yeah! I really really dig this article; I literally laughed so hard I had an asthma attack. Andorin has improved it since its first nom, and Chief peed on it. Seriously, it's an awesome article. Love, 07:30, August 5, 2010 (UTC)
Keeping the score an even number. SirMacManiaGUN—[18:55 5 Aug 2010]
For. I feared the worst from the title; but this is hilarious. It also keeps the encyclopaedic tone beautifully, something that's become rarer in recent Uncyc articles. mAttlobster. (hello) 19:56, August 5, 2010 (UTC)
For. Feature worthy - kinda like Texas Chain Saw Massacre made a fortune! Funnybony 17:13, Aug 9 17:13, August 9, 2010 (UTC)
For.. Granted it's not an epic once-in-a-generation masterpiece, but definitely worthy of VFH -- Prof. OliproKUN(W)AnchorOpBur. (Harass) 19:16, August 9, 2010 (UTC)
Against. I'm still more of a fan of the idea than the execution. The idea is great, it makes me smile. But the article still feels laboured. A couple of decent lines have been added, but for me, I feel like I'm working through a lot of explanation for just a few pay-offs, and only a couple of those are worth it. I may be missing some gems, but I did read it a couple of times, and it just didn't engage me or make me chuckle. Hope that's enough explanation. --UU - natter12:55, Aug 6
Against. I'm no prude and I'll try most things once, but(t} think in its excitement this delivers far too quickly. My feeling is that a lot more could have been packed in. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
Comment: This is just my opinion, but I think it's nice for people to explain when they vote against something. --AndorinKato 18:53, August 5, 2010 (UTC)
We had a secret off-site agreement. IronLung 00:02, August 6, 2010 (UTC)
I WOULD VOTE ON THIS - BUT OH WAIT, A BUNCH OF US AGREED TO VOTE FOR IT ON IRC AND THAT'S CHEATING. --nachlader 21:08, August 5, 2010 (UTC)
This thing about voting blocks on VFH, some organized off-site, I don't get it. I vote for the articles I think are featurable among those nominated. No other criteria. When I put a page up which I think is sponge-worthy, if it isn't picking up votes in four or five days I ask a few people to read it and vote if they like it. Everyone who is a regular on VFH would read all the pages and vote for the very good ones. Same with Top 10 of the month (this month I didnt even vote for one of my pages, or my buddy Funnybony's) Other than that, it's something else than VFH or Top Ten. Aleister 22:39 5 8
I'm rather certain he was sarcastically relating to a separate incident. --AndorinKato 22:48, August 5, 2010 (UTC)
Not really, it relates back to here apparantly. But no matter what, this is a great page and should be featured ASAP. Nice work. Aleister 00:06 6 8
Featured. I Dub thee knight of featured articles, Rise Sir Anal Sex. Prof. OliproKUN(W)AnchorOpBur. (Harass) 19:17, August 9, 2010 (UTC) This article has passed VFH and was featured on 11 August 2010. This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.