Against. - Ban this filth.--Sycamore(Talk) 18:17, July 14, 2010 (UTC)
Seriously? --AndorinKato 18:31, July 14, 2010 (UTC)
Against. The idea is funny, but the execution is a bit labored. Rev. Zim (Talk)Get saved! 17:06, July 15, 2010 (UTC)
Against. Zim_ulator took the words out of my mouth. Brilliant concept, but after the smile I got from realizing what I was reading, I didn't get very many more. pillow talk 01:13, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
Against. Per the two above. --UU - natter11:48, Jul 16
Against. Again, interesting concept, but you can only run with it for so long. SirMacManiaGUN—[13:12 16 Jul 2010]
Comments
Is this an attempt to turn this site into ED Lite? Will also cause a problem for quite a few users if this becomes a front page feature if they are at work or college. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:54, July 13, 2010 (UTC)
This problem is easily solved by switching the nude pic at the top with the pic that Frog talks about. Recent rants by some users brought a type of consensus that NSFW images should not lead off a feature page. Otherwise, this article is well written and conceived. Aleister 9:46 13 7
Due to overwhelming complaints from the masses, I have adjusted the images. --AndorinKato 18:11, July 13, 2010 (UTC)
It actually doesn't matter what picture leads off a page, as a matter of fact I've heard none of these rants, since an admin can pick whatever image (s)he wants to accompany the article blurb on the front page. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 18:14, July 13, 2010 (UTC)
There was a massive fought-out Forum about this topic awhile back, a knock-down drag-out calling each other names and whinnnnnneeeee template conflict after a couple girls in bathing suits were pictured and it looked like they actually had breasts on themselves. But nobody mentioned that an admin can pick the picture, this would "change everything" about the topic. Thanks for pointing that out. Aleister 22:35 13 7
The nomination was not successful. regrettably, low health rm (25%). itll always live on in my heart!TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK This article did not pass VFH and was removed on 18:43, July 16, 2010 (UTC). This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.