Interesting concept, but isn't really that funny, if you ask me. --Scofield & The Machine 07:34, June 18, 2011 (UTC)
Against. All front and end but missing a satisfactory middle to make this work as feature in my view. Sorry. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 12:41, June 20, 2011 (UTC)
But enough about your mother - what did you think of the article? Pup 12:47 20 Jun '11
Comments
You may want to work on the formatting. Having all the images like that doesn't look very good, and the stuff at the bottom just isn't cross-browser compatible, or got broken somewhere along the way. I'd say more, but I'm not entirely sure what you're trying to do. 1234~12:52, 18 June 2011
Done. Pup 08:41 18 Jun '11 20:41, June 18, 2011 (UTC)
I guess this just leaves me at a loss as to why it's there. Also, those images still look bad at higher resolutions. 1234~13:47, 20 June 2011
The nomination was not successful. low helf, 29%TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK This article did not pass VFH and was removed on 02:59, June 23, 2011 (UTC). This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.
self nom and for This is the article that I always felt was the one that got away. Time to try it a third time. 
Against. All front and end but missing a satisfactory middle to make this work as feature in my view. Sorry. --
