Against. Even if this were not an invalid nomination as it is a self-nom and there is no PEE review, I would still go against. It has potential to be amusing but doesn't go about doing it the right way. If you are serious about nomming it submit it for a PEE review, and someone will be able to help you. Not FA material in its current state. ChiefjusticeDS 17:50, December 11, 2009 (UTC)
This is a good start, but it needs more work. I went ahead and posted a welcome message on your talkpage, which should provide all the information you need. As Chief already mentioned, self-noms require a pee review, making this nom invalid. —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM17:57, 11 December 2009
Against. Not a VFH. Too loose and wanders around too much and off topic to be interesting. RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 13:36, December 12, 2009 (UTC)
Against. Per above. Although you did quite a bit for your first day here; congrats on that. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 17:14, December 12, 2009 (UTC)
The nomination was not successful. rm -3. Also, Invalid nom, as self-noms require a pee reviewSirModusoperandiBoinc! This article did not pass VFH and was removed on 19:08, December 12, 2009 (UTC). This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.