For. Although it could use a link to UnScripts:Average Cop in there. C'mon, it's crying out for one... --UU - natter15:24, Feb 25
Weak For. I would like to see some more leg length, but it's good enough as it is. •••Necropaxx(T){~}16:11, Feb 25
Fwhore. I guess it could have stood to be a little longer, but I do kind of like it at the length it is now, too. pillow talk 17:58, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Sure the text is fine but the pictures! Oh my god the pictures!! That woman is hooot! --Kittalk09:37 26 February
omg she is so hawt ahd taht one time she fought those ninjas and was like WHAP WHACK Hee-YAH!. --S0.S0S.0S.0S0 15:04, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
For. per aboive Mnb'z 06:24, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
The link to Prettiestpretty's userpage did it. Oh wait, the rest of the article was hilarious too. It's short, sweet, and yet I want to fight it in a very formulaic and cliched manner with outstanding camera angles and terrible dialogue. —SirSysRq (talk) 20:06, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
For. I normally abstain from articles I consider length challenged but the writing has won me over on this one.-- 20:22, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
Against: 0
No against votes
Comments
Abstain. I really like it, it follows good veins. But I thought it was a tad short and could even explore the joke a bit further. However, I wouldn't dare vote against it. Consider this a conditional for then. ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 23:35, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Some of our featured articles tend to be rather short. This is certainly not too short to be featured. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 23:45, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Screw it, you're right. I'm being picky. ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 23:59, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
In my Pee Review I recommended making it longer, but only if the standard of humour could be maintained. I also said I would beat against voters with the wooden leg I got in Nam if their vote was based on length alone. You've been warned. IronLung 00:32, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Featured. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 00:13, 28 February 2009 (UTC) This article has passed VFH and was featured on 28 February 2009. This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.