Against. I quoth the Book Of RAHBelations, wherein it is written, "Explaining why something is ridiculous isn't particularly funny in its own right." -RAHB 23:43, September 25, 2012 (UTC)
Against Just doesn't make the cut for me. -- Rei (talk) 13:31, September 27, 2012 (UTC)
Comments
RAHB I think you're wrong here. Your statement in quotes is correct, but it doesn't apply here. This is doing so much more than that - it is making use of a very strong and well-used method of satirizing practices or attitudes that one, should not be real but are, and two, no one really admits to, and three, are ridiculous. And it does it well. I'm not trying to convince you to change your vote or anything, I just want you to change your vote - in light, of course, of my brilliant and incontrovertible counter-argument. Plus, no dick jokes. --GlobalTourniquet: UnAstrologer, UnJournalist, shamelessnarcissisticAmerica-hatingliberalatheistaward-winningfeaturedwriter 15:17, September 26, 2012 (UTC)
I was sent here to make your teeth hurt. It was destined from the very beginning. I don't know how to find out the third person singular form of any of these words which makes me feel really stupid for not being able to get all sarcastic and stuff with a snappy remark in the third person singular. But I'll re-read the article anyway. -RAHB 04:25, September 27, 2012 (UTC)
17:08, September 15, 2012 (UTC)
N+F. --
Against. I quoth the Book Of RAHBelations, wherein it is written, "Explaining why something is ridiculous isn't particularly funny in its own right." -
