For Poor, poor, poor, poor people. -- 19:49, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
For. As a reluctant supporter of the writer's strike (I know it's for a cause, but I still miss The Office) I found this article to be excellent both as relevant satire and as some damn good writing. ~MinitrueSirSysRq!Talk!Sex!=/GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF (@ 22:51 23 Dec, 2007)
Not for I am not certain to understand this.--Randy Bentwick 20:47, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
# Against I don't really get this one at all. --—The preceding unsigned comment was added bySawblade5 (talk • contribs) 04:02, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
May I recommend to the 2 above that they abstain when they don't understand? This article is such good prose, satire, and humor that Mooses might make good money if he crossed the picket! However, don't think he would and I don't want him to. Long live the REVO?UT?ON!!11!111!. --Major'GUN' Ggarfield, Le Marquis de Nofu .Complex! 17:27, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
Against I am still against the feature of this page as I don't find it funny at all. I did look through it a few times and decided to vote against it. --—The preceding unsigned comment was added bySawblade5 (talk • contribs) 22:27, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Featured. and STM regains the lead. Your move LJ! ~ Mordillo where is my BULLCRAP? 09:27, 28 December 2007 (UTC) This article has passed VFH and was featured on 29 December 2007. This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.