Uncyclopedia:VFH/Allahakbarries

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Allahakbarries (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Allahakbarries	Score: 14.5 homicidal fundamentalist cricketers
Nominated by:	IronLung 20:06, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
For: 16.5	Nom & self-for. Pee reviewed and revised; let's see how this does. IronLung 20:06, 17 January 2009 (UTC) For. I think this one's ready. pillow talk 05:42, 18 January 2009 (UTC) For.--Sycamore (Talk) 09:09, 18 January 2009 (UTC) For. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 21:06, 18 January 2009 (UTC) For. T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 05:54, 19 January 2009 (UTC) For - "This was possibly due to the proud Scottish tradition of ignoring common sense." -Win. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:00, Jan 20 For. I like. --UU - natter 16:24, Jan 20 Weak for. Funny, though I'm not a fan of the cliche Muslim jihadists. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 04:14, 26 January 2009 (UTC) For It's good enough. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 03:19, 31 January 2009 (UTC) for. absurdly english. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 17:29, 2 February 2009 (UTC) For. Clever idea nicely done. Concernedresident 19:36, 9 February 2009 (UTC) For. Yes. MrN  Fork you! 18:17, Feb 12 For. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 22:55, 16 Feb 2009 For. I still hate the fact I didn't get here first. Asahatter (annoy) 21:49, 18 February 2009 (UTC) For I knew I was going to vote for after the opening paragraph. Nice artcle. -OptyC Sucks! CUN21:40, 21 Feb For. –72.193.236.89 08:49, 24 February 2009 (UTC) Inshallah. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 12:45, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Against: 2	didn't find it funny. --Docile hippopotamus 03:33, 20 January 2009 (UTC) Against. Ditto. --Guildensternenstein 18:24, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Abstain I really don't get the humor. --Mnbvcxz 00:49, 18 January 2009 (UTC) Abstain. Barris?—Flutter | Callz ⒇HNU - Help! - Profile - Fun! - Awards 04:42, 13 February 2009 (UTC) Fun fact: I'm reasonably certain that no article that Sycamore and TKF have both voted for has ever failed to be featured. I'm absolutely certain that no article that Sycamore, TKF, and I have all voted for has ever failed to be featured. Either this is going on the front page, or it's going to set a brand new precedent. pillow talk 06:51, 19 January 2009 (UTC) Yeah, it's going to be called "Hyperbole's Curse". IronLung 07:44, 19 January 2009 (UTC) So what you say is: we should vote "for" on it just because TKF and Sycamore voted "for" on it.--Mnbvcxz 16:08, 20 January 2009 (UTC) If any of you find cricket hilarious, there's a great section of the cricket terminology article about Benaud's rating system that merits some sort of immediate expansion into a larger article, which would almost certainly be completely misunderstood by everybody. IronLung 08:06, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.