If your article doesn't make it to the front page, don't despair. It may be eligible to be Quasi-featured so long as it meets certain criteria.
Any and all violators of policy will be
caught by an ant-lion.
Self-nomination regulation: self-nominated articles (i.e. you write an article and then decide to nominate it yourself) no longer require a pee review. Pee Review is still highly recommended for newer users. Do not clog up VFH with poor quality self-nominated articles... or else.
VFH is not a discussion page. If you'd like constructive criticism for your article, please submit it to Uncyclopedia:Pee Review.
For. This is a hilarious and well-written article.--HolUp (talk) 01:41, November 20, 2016 (UTC)
For. How is this not featured already? NyanKittyKat (talk) 20:11, November 23, 2016 (UTC)
Against Votes: 1
Against. This article was done by the Imperial Colonization team (Brits, at a time where the most appealing strategy for an Obama article was black-versus-white, plus the spin that his opponents suffered from gradual paranoia). There are more appealing spins on this horrible Presidency now that he is done and lecturing the Greeks that America's progress was driven by his personal charisma. Nominator asked me to rewrite it, I did not, but believe that a better version is possible using retrospect, and would not freeze it in its current form. Spıke02:05 20-Nov-16
Spıke04:41 17-Nov-16 04:41, November 17, 2016 (UTC)
For Votes: 3
Self-Nom and For. So, I had just cleaned this out of Votes for deletion, not because there were the number of Delete votes required by rule but that there were a few, plus scads of comments that a rewrite would be fun, and EStop had already begun rewriting it and posted me that the water was fine and c'mon in. I think we go halvsies. Spıke04:41 17-Nov-16
For. A great rewrite. I was tempted to add a picture, but since that collectible coin had a crude hand gesture on it, I refrained. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN)Talk here. 04:58, November 17, 2016 (UTC)
For. And they say money does not bring happiness. EStop⚓ 10:20, November 22, 2016 (UTC)
For. Outside the box, but clever & funny. EStop⚓ 08:04, September 18, 2016 (UTC)
Against Votes: 2
Against. Well-written, but is not an encyclopedia article (but a letter to the Powers That Be), not about anything real, navelism about the past of Uncyclopedia, humor backbone is a contrived acronym. We have uses for our main page that will be more engaging for new readers. Spıke16:11 9-Sep-16