If your article doesn't make it to the front page, don't despair. It may be eligible to be Quasi-featured so long as it meets certain criteria.
Any and all violators of policy will be
Self-nomination regulation: self-nominated articles (i.e. you write an article and then decide to nominate it yourself) no longer require a pee review. Pee Review is still highly recommended for newer users. Do not clog up VFH with poor quality self-nominated articles... or else.
VFH is not a discussion page. If you'd like constructive criticism for your article, please submit it to Uncyclopedia:Pee Review.
For. I did the section on the Thunderbirds movie and Shameless Product Placement. Romartus came up with the comedy strategy of Gerry Anderson/Gerry Adams and linking it to Irish terrorism, and illustrated it. Spıke04:12 20-May-17
For. A detailed, hilarious distribute of the final Star Wars prequel. A collaborative effort between me, Irritable of contents, and some other guys whose name I've forgotten.--HolUp (talk) 12:28, May 15, 2017 (UTC)
Shameless Self nom & For A hilarious and superior description of a criminally overrated film. SIR MAC BOSWELL ☢ 12:17, May 15, 2017 (UTC)
For. Never saw the movie but I love the soundtrack (don't kill me).--HolUp (talk) 12:22, May 15, 2017 (UTC)
Against Votes: 2
Well put together, but needs some pruning. Pete.b.lane (talk) 18:05, May 15, 2017 (UTC)
Not well put together. Intro has aimless parade of memes. Being killed in a collision with a garbage truck is typical and yet the high point. Cast and Discography are listcruft. Is there a comedy strategy? Aha, Tony pisses himself. Spıke00:24 19-May-17
Self-nom and For.Macboswell and I tried to foist this VFD deletion on one another despite neither of us knowing who the hell the subject was. However, on Uncyclopedia, unfamiliarity with the subject is not the end but the start of many projects. This personality from our pre-Civil War past was an apt topic, eager to march to war with 1% of the promised manpower. Spıke01:30 14-May-17
For. Found this old article and gave it a few minor tweeks. The original article is straight crazy, yet it has some clever things to say about space travel and mythology. WeatherUnderground (talk) 17:16, April 21, 2017 (UTC)
For. Loved it! I found the diagram of the spacecraft particularly informative. Chunkles☎ talk✏️ contribs 00:25, May 15, 2017 (UTC)
Against Votes: 0
No against votes
Page (which presents Voyeur I) and this nomination were moved to avoid having the real page name be a pun for the reader to guess. Spıke18:34 21-Apr-17
Though it's a decent article, it feels a little half-baked to me. I think more about the space craft itself, how it looks and operates could open the flood gates to comedy goodness. SIR MAC BOSWELL ☢22:08, April 21, 2017 (UTC)
Wrote some more and added a silly image. Feel free to write more, but I think it's long enough now. --WeatherUnderground (talk) 13:16, April 23, 2017 (UTC)
For Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster pitching Superman to their editor (Max Gaines maybe?). It won't take more than a New York minute to read thru and you won't regret it. Irritable of contents (talk) 17:16, April 2, 2017 (UTC)
For. A five star unreview that exemplifies how to over analyze. I'm sure there's more lenses of literary criticism to view Zero Wing from, so perhaps it's a bit premature. Irritable of contents (talk) 03:17, March 16, 2017 (UTC)