If your article doesn't make it to the front page, don't despair. It may be eligible to be Quasi-featured so long as it meets certain criteria.
Any and all violators of policy will be
Self-nomination regulation: self-nominated articles (i.e. you write an article and then decide to nominate it yourself) no longer require a pee review. Pee Review is still highly recommended for newer users. Do not clog up VFH with poor quality self-nominated articles... or else.
VFH is not a discussion page. If you'd like constructive criticism for your article, please submit it to Uncyclopedia:Pee Review.
For. Entered in the Springtime Writing Contest. Spıke23:48 30-Apr-16
For. Obviously. Short and sweet, yet still manages to touch on many of the points found in the original Wikipedia article. I did not even know about cloudy/clear lemonade until I started writing this. Chunkles☎ talk✏️ contribs 16:28, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
Nom and For. Surprisingly, especially with his Ohio win, John Kasich is still in the 2016 presidential race. This article should be nominated because his campaign's best days will possibly be behind him at some point. Thares (talk) 23:38, March 17, 2016 (UTC)
For. There could be a brokered convention, but I think that's unlikely. This will take a while to reach 5 votes, anyway... --PlaceHolderUserNameMy talk! 19:52, March 18, 2016 (UTC)
Author did exactly what I asked him to: read Kasich's actual biography on Wikipedia and try to pin this article to that. Unfortunately, the effect is to take various facts from Kasich's past (birthplace, religion, university) and take a series of cheap shots. Kasich is still in the race, despite the impossibility of winning it unless there is treachery in Cleveland, including using him to "unify" everyone who calls himself Republican through a candidate who appeals to everyone who doesn't. That is: His candidacy is a joke that remains untold, and a continuing story even though this article screeches to a halt at Super Tuesday. More work, please! Spıke16:27 18-Apr-16
SNF Someone else copied this over from the spoon/fork/knife/cutlery. Admittedly I rushed it a little before last Christmas when life became too busy so maybe it needs a little copy-editing here and there. --Nikau (talk) 03:15, March 6, 2016 (UTC)
For. Great article! EStop⚓ 10:50, March 11, 2016 (UTC)
Against Votes: 0
No against votes
Comment. User:Abacab333 posting this may constitute plagiarism. Nikau (talk) 15:13, March 7, 2016 (UTC)
As explained on User talk:Romartus, I have removed any false implication of authorship. But you can't both claim its presence here violates your rights, and continue improving it and nominate it for feature! Spıke15:55 7-Mar-16
The whole rights issue associated with both sites is a massive mess. However we have the complication that if he posted it without permission on this site after copying from the other one and it is ultimately "not removable" based on the rules one agrees to while editing then there is a debatable rights violation if you want to get legalistic. This is probably covered by the Creative Commons SA License but it's fairly eye opening to the fact that nothing submitted to either site is ever yours again, as the Cow tipping fiasco proved. --Nikau (talk) 16:38, March 7, 2016 (UTC)
Oh and the contradiction was because I didn't consider the rights implications until today. --Nikau (talk) 16:52, March 7, 2016 (UTC)
For. Nominator didn't vote, but I will, though it might be too late, as His Royal Hugeness has "suspended" his Presidential campaign and returned to New Jersey to mundane stuff like finally dispatching snowplows.Spıke12:37 18-Feb-16
For. I didn't know I could vote for more than one article. But NEVER MIND! Father Christiemas is off back to Noo Jersey, but he might deserve one last hurrah before he disappears into obscurity.--PlaceHolderUserNameMy talk! 20:17, February 20, 2016 (UTC)
For. Educational, clever and funny! EStop⚓ 16:44, February 21, 2016 (UTC)
Comment. I think it's well written enough to be featured, it is however the wrong time to feature it as his career is still up in the air for the next few months. Assuming he became VP (possible) then that's another 4 years of material. Nikau (talk) 05:31, March 7, 2016 (UTC)
We have updated featured articles and may be Chris Christie will disappear in a food buffet and never re-emerge. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 10:45, March 7, 2016 (UTC)
Christie's career is not still up in the air in 2016; it is now the big Tuesday after Super Tuesday and Christie's only role is standing behind Trump and wishing he had some meat, a Wish Sandwich. As Romartus suggests, if he makes VP despite the impossibility of delivering New Jersey as Kasich (God help us) could deliver Ohio, we will resume writing. Spıke01:47 16-Mar-16