Nom & For - I have to say that this is probably the Uncyclopedia article with the best writing conventions I've ever seen around here. It is very funny, and uses the encyclopedic form very well. Also, a great subject. --Major'GUN' Ggarfield, Le Marquis de Nofu .Complex! 20:07, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
For with every point yew made agreed fully :) ~FagxFS
For Most amusing article--OliverKnight 12:22, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
For I, apparently am I allowed to vote for my article. It seems naughty, but I'm doing it anyway. So there.--OnionHeadHat 18:00, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
The nomination was not successful. rm +5 low health (45%) Sorry man, this just barely fell below the dividing line...TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK This article did not pass VFH and was removed on 23:10, 20 December 2007 (UTC). This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.