For. I did make some suggestions for a change in structure but I see Guildy didn't go in that direction. Still, despite that the article is good enough for VFH. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 06:19, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
Comment. Yes, I do self-nominate a lot, but in my defense people rarely nominate for me, and when they do it's always (somehow) when my article isn't ready. Funny how stuff works like that. Though it's sort of funny, Cajek said that Duty was really good, and that is should be on VFH, but didn't nom it (even though every third article on here is nominated by Cajek, it seems), and then Globey gave me the best Pee Review I've ever had (46/50!), and didn't nominate said article either. It's like, dude, what's up with that? Not that I'm complaining--I suppose when things come down to it I'd rather have such things in my hands--but just saying. —UnführerGuildyRittervonGuildensternenstein 23:25, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
Comment. I agree with Guildy. I should've nommed it. Le Cejak•<0:43 Jun 11, 2009>
Comment. Page Vandal 02:39, June 13, 2011 (UTC) T. (talk) 15:19, 12 June 2009 (UTC) This article has passed VFH and was featured on 14 June 2009. This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.