Against. I've stopped giving the prolific Guily my auto-seal of approval. This is a well-written, nicely formatted article, but it was unfortunately very forgettable and without any humour for the drive-by reader with no subject familiarity. David Lynch was a funny article; this is a formulaic rehash. IronLung 09:37, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
The fact that the article is written in the style of Japanese people talking in a bizzare and over-stereotypical manner wouldn't be funny to someone with no prior knowledge of Kurosawa? —UnführerGuildyRittervonGuildensternenstein 18:29, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
It's a nice touch, but not funny. I read your article completely stone-faced, which is not the normal reaction one would have to a Guildy article. I take this to mean that the "obscure director" format has got tired. IronLung 22:18, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
Not pee reviewed! Uncyc has rules, man! Without rules, where would we be? WHERE? But seriously, yeah, self noms without reviews. Le Cejak•<14:38 May 31, 2009>
Er... It's okay to self-nominate if the article has been on Pee Review for a week or more... Unless you guys changed the rules in the few weeks I disappeared. /goes and checks. Nope. Rules haven't been changed. Self-nomination regulation: Self-nominated articles (i.e. you write an article and then decide to nominate it yourself) must receive at least one critique via Pee Review before nomination (or at least spend a week on Pee Review if you can't get anyone to look at it).MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 19:14, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
Author's Comment: This is certainly not the reaction I expected. If you all feel that this isn't up to par, I'm going to re-rewrite the whole thing from scratch. Akira Kurosawa is my favorite director of all time, and his article here deserves nothing less than a feature in my eyes. I already have a completely new concept I plan on implementing for my re-rewrite, which I should hopefully have done soon. In the meantime, I beseech you all to vote against to get this off the queue. —UnführerGuildyRittervonGuildensternenstein 01:45, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
The nomination was not successful. rm -3TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK This article did not pass VFH and was removed on 01:56, 1 June 2009 (UTC). This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.