Self nom and for Make sure you get to the bottom. SirPadddy5 CUN VFH 23:26, June 21, 2010 (UTC)
For. The ending made me smile. —Pelozurian (talk) 04:31, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Bless. Innovative format and idea. Nice work. Aleister 4:47 22 6 MMX
For. I like it. Saberwolf116 23:19, June 24, 2010 (UTC)
Against: 2
Meh. I dunno, the punch that was supposed to come at the end just didn't work for me. I would vote for it on VFG, but not here. Sorry. --SirHELPMETalk(more? --> CUNROTMNOTMPlebUSSPeesSK)On Tuesday, 04:52, June 22 2010 UTC
Against. It's got the right idea but don't like this particular execution. RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:50, June 22, 2010 (UTC)
Ah, screw the lot of yous. You make a page about stapling toast to the wall, and you get featured instantly, have champagne parties on top of the Empire State Building and get your face carved into Mount Rushmore. You make a page about OUR LORD JESUS CHRIST AND HOW HE WILL SAVE ALL CHRISTIANS AND KILL EVERYONE OF EVERY OTHER RELIGION and you get 1 MEASLY SCORE. IF YOU TAKE MINE OUT, IT'S 0! IT HAS A SCORE OF 0 NOTHINGS! SCREW YOU! SCREW THE LOT OF YOUS! SirPadddy5 CUN VFH 16:12, June 22, 2010 (UTC)
The lot of ya??? I voted Bless for your page, and in so doing honored the fuckin' lord jesus christ and his overbearing mother, mary. And for this I get yelled at like a common thief hanging on a cross or taking 30 pieces of silver and distributing it to 30 whores one after the other. Screw yous toos. Ya. Aleister 2:01 25 6 MMX
"The lot of ya" just meant everyone in the whole world, as opposed to the people on Uncyclopedia. Thanks for voting for it those that did. SirPadddy5 CUN VFH 11:29, June 25, 2010 (UTC)
Abstain. Per Socky. Needs... something... Also, please change the color of those links. Dark blue on black doesn't look right. Would you like a cookie,sir? 20:35,25June,2010
The nomination was not successful. 25 % +2~ This article did not pass VFH and was removed on 16:28, June 26, 2010 (UTC). This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.