Weak for. Bit short and the humour is slightly mostly non-exclusive, but the concept duly suprised me. ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 10:00, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
For. I enjoyed it. What can I say? =)Saberwolf116 12:21, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
Weak f♥r. —SirSysRq (talk) 20:34, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
Against: 9
Against.. I think it is still too short. One idea worked a number of different ways with diminishing comic return. --Romartus 08:41, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
Against.. Romartus said it best. •••Necropaxx(T){~}16:18, Mar 27
Against. I don't think the addition, pedophilia, and the unabomber are a winning combination. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 03:52, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
Against. The basic concept seems good, but I think more work can be done. It seems a bit short. SirStarnestommy(Talk • Contribs • CUN) 00:30, Mar. 29, 2009
The nomination was not successful. Low health (19%)MrNFork you! 00:50, Apr 7 This article did not pass VFH and was removed on 00:50, 7 April 2009 (UTC). This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.