Uncyclopedia:VFH/Accuracy dispute

Score: -3 hanging chads

1. N&F I stated two years ago that this should be featured, and I just now realized that I can actually make it happen. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate} 04:29, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
2. for. i enjoyed that. i think. Lance AdmiralGerrycheeversGunTalk 17:10, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
3. For Funny for the sleep deprived. --Pleb KUN Dexter111344 • Complain here • Vote now! 05:09, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

1. Against - So many templates! No pictures! And to my taste, the repetition pushed its way out of "funny" and into "boring." pillow talk 23:45, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
2. As per Hyperbole ~ Mgr.ReadMeSoon!? 23:49, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
3. Against Short, repetitive, cliche. -RAHB 04:55, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
4. Against Nah. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 05:03, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
5. Against. I see the point of the templates, sort of, but there's too much repetition, and it does need pics. Plus, it didn't really amuse me, and I suppose I should say something predictable here about repetition. --UU - Oim frum Englund! 11:24, Jul 29
6. Against Na. MrN  17:10, Jul 29

• Abstain. - I think in the nicest of ways that it needs to have a little more work to make it a bit more like the features we have now--Sycamore (Talk) 09:50, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
• Abst I really like the templates at the bottom but the rest was pretty boring. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 11:28, 29 July 2008 (UTC)