Self-W♥v. Thanks RAHB. This was a TDB entry that apparently was thought to be of some value. I enjoyed writing it, anyways. Who knows, I may be getting my groove back after all. sirsysrq@ 03:19 Dec 22
Yes: It must be a lack-of-sanity thing. My deep mental scars not only allow me to like this article, it also gets my "yes" vote to put it on the front page. Maybe on April 1st, we can highlight the article and use the bucket picture as the UncyclopediA logo for the day, making the image inescapable.-- 13:33, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
Tasteless, yes. Funny, no. There's a good opportunity for satire here except it just wasn't all... together. Particularly the last sentence. The funny (which there is) is overwhelmed by the tasteless parts. --SirDJ~Irreverent 14:14, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Against per above. Its tasteless but not funny, it should be tasteless and funny.--Mnbvcxz 17:06, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Against. More disgusting than hilarious, IMO. •••Necropaxx(T){~}00:27, Dec 23
Against. completely tasteless 173.102.100.102 03:42, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
Comments
Abs I like the article. It's quality stuff and probably fits the subject matter perfectly. Just did not laugh. Sorry man. I'm looking forward to your next ;) MrNFork you! 19:11, Dec 26
The nomination was not successful. low health (7%)MrNFork you! 19:11, Dec 26 This article did not pass VFH and was removed on 19:11, 26 December 2008 (UTC). This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.
