Uncyclopedia:VFH/Abortion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

< Uncyclopedia:VFH
Revision as of 06:36, April 27, 2011 by Fnoodle (talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search


Abortion (history, logs)

Article: Abortion

Score: 0.5

Nominated by: RAHB 03:07, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
For: 4
  1. Yes -RAHB 03:07, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
  2. Self-W♥v. Thanks RAHB. This was a TDB entry that apparently was thought to be of some value. I enjoyed writing it, anyways. Who knows, I may be getting my groove back after all. sirIgnignokt.gifsysrq @ 03:19 Dec 22
  3. Yes: It must be a lack-of-sanity thing. My deep mental scars not only allow me to like this article, it also gets my "yes" vote to put it on the front page. Maybe on April 1st, we can highlight the article and use the bucket picture as the UncyclopediA logo for the day, making the image inescapable.--DRStrangesig5 Sherman Fingertalk  13:33, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
  4. For Tasty. --MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 21:42, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
Against: 3.5
  1. Tasteless, yes. Funny, no. There's a good opportunity for satire here except it just wasn't all... together. Particularly the last sentence. The funny (which there is) is overwhelmed by the tasteless parts. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent Icons-flag-au Noobaward Wotm Unbooks mousepad GUN 14:14, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
  2. Against per above. Its tasteless but not funny, it should be tasteless and funny.--Mnbvcxz 17:06, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
  3. Against. More disgusting than hilarious, IMO. Necropaxx (T) {~} 00:27, Dec 23
  4. Against. completely tasteless 173.102.100.102 03:42, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
Comments
  • Abs I like the article. It's quality stuff and probably fits the subject matter perfectly. Just did not laugh. Sorry man. I'm looking forward to your next ;) MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 19:11, Dec 26

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Personal tools
projects