For ramming it down my throat Le Cejak•<18:07 Oct 11, 2008>
No I've had it up to here with sexual innuendo. It's funny in moderation, not when it's rammed down you throat all the damn ti- oh :(. The sexual overtones added nothing and seemed to be a cover for what was a good yet not well built upon idea of backup dancers. Those kind of jokesare old, and I can't really see myself ever voting for this. --SirDJ~Irreverent 08:48, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
Also against, also per DJ. It's the names of the songs and groups that bother me the most. It's too obvious to be funny, and it happens so often that by the end of the article you're sitting around waiting for the next sex joke. –SirSkullthumper,MD(criticize•writings•formspring) 16:02 Oct 06, 2008
Against, again, as per DJ. It's fine spaced out and in (extreme) moderation, but when its innuendo joke after innuendo joke after innuendo joke after innuendo joke after innuendo joke, it gets old quickly. Kind of like everything I've ever wrote. —–Sir Heerenveen,KUNUotMRotMVFH (talk), 11/10 18:11
abstain. well-written and such, but not quite in 'for' territory for me. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:47, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
The nomination was not successful. rm low health 20% +3~ This article did not pass VFH and was removed on 07:46, 14 October 2008 (UTC). This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.